The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sexual harassment of uppity women.
Abstract
In 3 studies, the author tested 2 competing views of sexual harassment: (a) It is motivated primarily by sexual desire and, therefore, is directed at women who meet feminine ideals, and (b) it is motivated primarily by a desire to punish gender-role deviants and, therefore, is directed at women who violate feminine ideals. Study 1 included male and female college students (N = 175) and showed that women with relatively masculine personalities (e.g., assertive, dominant, and independent) experienced the most sexual harassment. Study 2 (N = 134) showed that this effect was not because women with relatively masculine personalities were more likely than others to negatively evaluate potentially harassing scenarios. Study 3 included male and female employees at 5 organizations (N = 238) and showed that women in male-dominated organizations were harassed more than women in female-dominated organizations, and that women in male-dominated organizations who had relatively masculine personalities were sexually harassed the most.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Regression Analysis of Count Data
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139013567 · Cited by 6,640
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000) · Cited by 4,914
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
(1987) · Cited by 3,394
Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role interpretation
Eagly, A. H. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203781906 · Cited by 3,320
Heilman, M. E. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234 · Cited by 2,482
Logistic Regression Using the SAS System : Theory and Application
Allison, P. D. (1999) · Cited by 2,087
Cited by
Selective Incivility as Modern Discrimination in Organizations: Evidence and Impact
Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311418835 · Cited by 573
Sexual Harassment, Workplace Authority, and the Paradox of Power
McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122412451728 · Cited by 538
Harassment Based on Sex: Protecting Social Status in the Context of Gender Hierarchy
Berdahl, J. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351879 · Cited by 531
Self-citationJohnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002 · Cited by 492
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions
Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Berdahl, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 425-437
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2085702446
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 32.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sexual harassment of uppity women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425
- The paper
- Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
