The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, MANUFACTURING STRATEGY, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE.
Abstract
This study examines two alternative views—universal and contingency—of the human resources (HR)-performance relationship in manufacturing settings. Results from a survey of 97 plants primarily support a contingency approach to human resource management (HRM). An HR system focused on human capital enhancement was directly related to multiple dimensions of operational performance (i.e., employee productivity, machine efficiency, and customer alignment), but subsequent analysis revealed that this main effect was predominately the result of linking human-capital-enhancing HR systems with a quality manufacturing strategy. Other manufacturing strategies also moderated the HR-performance relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306 · Cited by 2,221
A disagreement about within-group agreement: disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus
Kozlowski, S. W., & Hattrup, K. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.2.161 · Cited by 514
Cited by
Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.12736076 · Cited by 2,996
Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda
Guest, D. E. (1997) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/095851997341630 · Cited by 1,908
Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23464011 · Cited by 1,489
Self-citationOn the validity of subjective measures of company performance
WALL, T. D., MICHIE, J., PATTERSON, M., WOOD, S. J., SHEEHAN, M., CLEGG, C. W., & WEST, M. (2004) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02485.x · Cited by 1,121
The performance impact of marketing resources
Hooley, G. J., Greenley, G. E., Cadogan, J. W., & Fahy, J. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(03)00109-7 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- YOUNDT, M. A., SNELL, S. A., DEAN, Jr., & LEPAK, D. P.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 836-866
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2025169019
- Cited by
- 2,272
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 37.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
