The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HELPING AND VOICE EXTRA-ROLE BEHAVIORS: EVIDENCE OF CONSTRUCT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITY.
Abstract
Results of this field study of 597 employees demonstrate the importance of extra-role behavior in explaining employee performance over a six-month period. Supervisors, peers, and employees differen...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Employees who are heavily embedded in the give-advice networks will be seen by their supervisors as performing a valuable service, as such employees not only improve coworker and organizational performance, but also engage in extra-role behaviors and gain in prestige (Völker and Flap 2004)—all of which tends to be rewarded in job performance evaluations (Podsakoff et al. 2000; Van Dyne and LePine”
From Enterprise System Implementation and Employee Job Performance: Understanding the Role of Advice Networks1 (2014) · cites this paper as Van Dyne and LePine 1998
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90037-t · Cited by 807
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810031002 · Cited by 7,997
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909 · Cited by 2,606
Self-citationPsychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305 · Cited by 2,577
A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438 · Cited by 2,533
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013079 · Cited by 2,356
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- ORCID
- LePine, J. A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-119
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2022051120
- Cited by
- 3,178
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 172 · 2025: 204 · 2024: 211 · 2023: 218 · 2022: 253 · 2021: 241 · 2020: 229 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 193 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 139 · 2014: 127 · 2013: 112 · 2012: 105
- FWCI
- 37.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- helping behavior, voice behavior, extra-role behavior, employee performance, construct validity, predictive validity, supervisor ratings, peer ratings, employee ratings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
