Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conjectures on Cognitive Simplification in Acquisition and Divestment Decision Making

Duhaime, Irene M., Schwenk, Charles R.·1985·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Acquisition and divestment decision situations generally are characterized by complexity and ambiguity. This paper proposes the idea that business decision makers may use cognitive simplifying processes in defining such ill-structured problems. A number of specific simplifying processes that may be used in acquisition and divestment are discussed. These ideas are supported by examples from recent field research and the business press. Impacts on resulting decisions are discussed; future research directions are suggested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/257970

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Duhaime, I. M., & Schwenk, C. R.
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1985-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
287
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100501090
Cited by
415
References
4
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conjectures on Cognitive Simplification in Acquisition and Divestment Decision Making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/257970
The paper
Duhaime, I. M., & Schwenk, C. R. (1985). Conjectures on Cognitive Simplification in Acquisition and Divestment Decision Making. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/257970

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.