The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management
Abstract
This article analyzes organizational functioning from the perspective of social cognitive theory, which explains psychosocial functioning in terms of triadic reciprocal causation. In this causal structure, behavior, cognitive, and other personal factors and environmental events operate as interacting determinants that influence each other bidirectionally. The application of the theory is illustrated in a series of experiments of complex managerial decision making, using a simulated organization. The interactional causal structure is tested in conjunction with experimentally varied organizational properties and belief systems that can enhance or undermine the operation of the self-regulatory determinants. Induced beliefs about the controllability of organizations and the conception of managerial ability strongly affect both managers' self-regulatory processes and their organizational attainments. Organizational complexity and assigned performance standards also serve as contributing influences. Path analys...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Group work, report presentations, and internships may have filled in the role of guided skill mastery, where students put to practice their recently developed skills in a 'safe' space with feedback (Wood and Bandura, 1989).”
From Impact of Entrepreneurship Training on Entrepreneurial Efficacy and Alertness among Adolescent Youth (2018) · cites this paper as Wood and Bandura, 1989
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, realistic verbal persuasion is helpful in overcoming lack of selfconfidence, improving self-regulation, encouraging individuals to put in more effort in performing a task (Wood and Bandura, 1989)”
From Impact of Entrepreneurship Training on Entrepreneurial Efficacy and Alertness among Adolescent Youth (2018) · cites this paper as Wood and Bandura, 1989
In the citing paper
“Internal and external school competitions may have played the final role of allowing students to take on directly increasingly difficult tasks that can build and stabilize their self-efficacy (Wood and Bandura, 1989).”
From Impact of Entrepreneurship Training on Entrepreneurial Efficacy and Alertness among Adolescent Youth (2018) · cites this paper as Wood and Bandura, 1989
In the citing paper
“The interactions with mentors and lessons on product development may have helped impart entrepreneurial skills and affirmed the self-belief of students about their capabilities (Wood and Bandura, 1989).”
From Impact of Entrepreneurship Training on Entrepreneurial Efficacy and Alertness among Adolescent Youth (2018) · cites this paper as Wood and Bandura, 1989
In the citing paper
“The presence of three crucial elements of mastery modeling (Wood and Bandura, 1989) in active/hands-on activities may have contributed to their effectiveness in building self-efficacy in the entrepreneurial skillset.”
From Impact of Entrepreneurship Training on Entrepreneurial Efficacy and Alertness among Adolescent Youth (2018) · cites this paper as Wood and Bandura, 1989
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586 · Cited by 2,675
Self-citationSelf-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 · Cited by 1,511
Self-citationTask complexity: Definition of the construct
Wood, R. E. (1986) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0 · Cited by 1,393 · cited 2×
“The complexity of decisions can vary along several dimensions (Wood, 1986).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSelf-efficacy conception of anxiety
Bandura, A. (1988) · Anxiety Research · doi:10.1080/10615808808248222 · Cited by 801
Self-citationTask complexity as a moderator of goal effects: a meta-analysis
Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1987) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.416 · Cited by 598
Expectations and Performance: An Empirical Test of Bandura's Self-efficacy Theory
Weinberg, R., Gould, D., & Jackson, A. (1979) · Journal of Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsp.1.4.320 · Cited by 315
The role of proximal intentions in self-regulation of refractory behavior
Bandura, A., & Simon, K. M. (1977) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01186792 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning
Bandura, A. (1993) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3 · Cited by 7,655
Self-citationSocial cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
Self-citationBuilding a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766
Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002 · Cited by 5,435
When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 · Cited by 3,837
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, R., & Bandura, A.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Wood, Robert
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009158521
- Cited by
- 3,357
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 189 · 2023: 217 · 2022: 189 · 2021: 209 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 180 · 2017: 143 · 2016: 135 · 2015: 148 · 2014: 144 · 2013: 117 · 2012: 129
- FWCI
- 35.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- social cognitive theory, organizational management, management decision-making, self-regulation, organizational complexity, performance standards, belief systems, perceived controllability, management skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
