Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Economic Organization: The Case for Candor

Williamson, Oliver E.·1996·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

The article reports on transitional cost economics (TCE) and opportunism in business. The author focuses on discussing the economic theory of industrial organization. It is suggested that research related to self-interest and cognitive styles is especially useful when considering aspects of organizational behavior. It is further suggested that TCE and industrial efficiency are connected to one another. The author discusses the strengths and weaknesses present in many professional contracts. Prediction methods are also examined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258628

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Williamson, O. E.
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1996-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
48
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154807756
Cited by
349
References
23
FWCI
31.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic Organization: The Case for Candor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/258628
The paper
Williamson, O. E. (1996). Economic Organization: The Case for Candor. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/258628

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.