Cited by 7,111Intellectual Capital and Performance AnalysisInnovation and Knowledge ManagementKnowledge Management and Sharing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage

Nahapiet, Janine, Ghoshal, Sumantra·1998·The Academy of Management Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/259373

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,065

Metadata

Authors
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S.
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1998-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
242
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4230348989
Cited by
7,111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 548 · 2025: 595 · 2024: 519 · 2023: 623 · 2022: 585 · 2021: 540 · 2020: 323 · 2019: 307 · 2018: 279 · 2017: 287 · 2016: 251 · 2015: 303 · 2014: 229 · 2013: 271 · 2012: 222
FWCI
58.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
social capital, intellectual capital, organizational advantage, enterprise competitiveness, knowledge management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review