The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Social Control of Technology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moral accountability also has an instrumental value.”
From Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them (2021) · cites this paper as Collingridge, 1980
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611
Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’
Guston, D. H. (2013) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312713508669 · Cited by 809
A Framework for Responsible Innovation
Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118551424.ch2 · Cited by 772
Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA
Arvidsson, R., Tillman, A., Sandén, B. A., Janssen, M., Nordelöf, A., Kushnir, D., & Molander, S. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12690 · Cited by 545
Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z.-M. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayne, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Operational Research Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 771-772
- ISSN
- 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9360
- OpenAlex
- W4299913095
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Operational Research Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Keywords
- social control, technology, technology regulation, social control of technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
