Cited by 577Information Systems Theories and ImplementationInnovation, Technology, and SocietyResearch, Science, and Academia

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Social Control of Technology

Mayne, Alan J.·1982·Journal of the Operational Research Society

DOI 10.2307/2634327

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/jors.1982.168

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611
Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’
Guston, D. H. (2013) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312713508669 · Cited by 809
A Framework for Responsible Innovation
Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118551424.ch2 · Cited by 772
Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA
Arvidsson, R., Tillman, A., Sandén, B. A., Janssen, M., Nordelöf, A., Kushnir, D., & Molander, S. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12690 · Cited by 545
Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z.-M. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9 · Cited by 507
Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them
Santoni de Sio, F., & Mecacci, G. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00450-x · Cited by 490
Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars
Stilgoe, J. (2018) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312717741687 · Cited by 375
Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within
Fisher, E., Mahajan, R. L., & Mitcham, C. (2006) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467606295402 · Cited by 375
Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain
Pidgeon, N., Lorenzoni, I., & Poortinga, W. (2007) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005 · Cited by 378
The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation
Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2 · Cited by 390
Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology
Swierstra, T., & Rip, A. (2007) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8 · Cited by 361
Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate
Stirling, A. (2007) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400953 · Cited by 347
Anticipatory innovation governance
Tõnurist, P., & Hanson, A. (2020) · OECD working papers on public governance · doi:10.1787/cce14d80-en · Cited by 353
The Sisyphean Cycle of Technology Panics
Orben, A. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620919372 · Cited by 316
AI bias: exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry
Belenguer, L. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00138-8 · Cited by 289
Working Towards Sustainable Development in the Face of Uncertainty and Incomplete Knowledge
Grünwald, A. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/15239080701622774 · Cited by 237
Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’
Zwart, H. A. E., Landeweerd, L., & van Rooij, A. (2014) · Life Sciences Society and Policy · doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x · Cited by 232
Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: Evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity
Bergerson, J. A., Brandt, A. R., Cresko, J., Carbajales‐Dale, M., MacLean, H. L., Matthews, H. S., McCoy, S., McManus, M. C., Miller, S. A., Morrow, W. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12954 · Cited by 237
The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks
Popa, E., van Hilten, M., Oosterkamp, E., & Bogaardt, M. (2021) · Life Sciences, Society and Policy · doi:10.1186/s40504-021-00113-x · Cited by 152
The ethics of uncertainty
Tannert, C., Elvers, H., & Jandrig, B. (2007) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401072 · Cited by 196
Anticipating the Interaction between Technology and Morality: A Scenario Study of Experimenting with Humans in Bionanotechnology
Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., & Stemerding, D. (2010) · Studies in Ethics Law and Technology · doi:10.2202/1941-6008.1098 · Cited by 201
“In addition to this lack of attention to moral questions, many forms of TA are hampered by the so-called Collingridge dilemma (Collingridge, 1980).”
Background
The politics of scaling
Pfotenhauer, S. M., Laurent, B., Papageorgiou, K., & Stilgoe, J. (2021) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127211048945 · Cited by 234
Assessing the Dutch Energy Transition Policy: How Does it Deal with Dilemmas of Managing Transitions?
Kemp, R., Rotmans, J. I., & Loorbach, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/15239080701622816 · Cited by 192
Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation
Schütz, F., Heidingsfelder, M. L., & Schraudner, M. (2019) · She ji · doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.002 · Cited by 239
Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions
Fisher, E. (2007) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0016-5 · Cited by 186
The Vulnerable World Hypothesis
Bostrom, N. (2019) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12718 · Cited by 188
A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation
Ribeiro, B., Smith, R., & Millar, K. M. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6 · Cited by 161
The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts
Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2016) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33525-4_19 · Cited by 176
The role of design in circular economy solutions for critical materials
Babbitt, C. W., Althaf, S., Rios, F. C., Bilec, M. M., & Graedel, T. E. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.014 · Cited by 170
Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation
Ribeiro, B., Bengtsson, L. G., Benneworth, P., et al. (2018) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1495033 · Cited by 147
What does the public think about artificial intelligence?—A criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI
Brauner, P., Hick, A., Philipsen, R., & Ziefle, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903 · Cited by 143
The Ethics of Computing
Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Mittelstadt, B. (2016) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2871196 · Cited by 152
Handbook on Science and Public Policy
Owen, R., & Pansera, M. (2019) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781784715946 · Cited by 161
Setting the stage for debating the roles of risk assessment and life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials
Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., Vijver, M. G., et al. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.135 · Cited by 111
Exploring early public responses to geoengineering
Pidgeon, N., Corner, A., Parkhill, K. A., Spence, A., Butler, C., & Poortinga, W. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0099 · Cited by 113
Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation
Stilgoe, J. (2015) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9646-0 · Cited by 107
“Collingridge was interested in identifying and seeking to ameliorate ‘the roots of inflexibility’ (Collingridge 1980, p. 45).”
BackgroundInfluential
Atlas of Social Innovation
(2019) · oekom verlag eBooks · doi:10.14512/9783962386887 · Cited by 102
The empathic care robot: A prototype of responsible research and innovation
Stahl, B. C., McBride, N. K., Wakunuma, K., & Flick, C. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.001 · Cited by 93
Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: An experimental deliberative approach
Bellamy, R., Lezaun, J., & Palmer, J. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.004 · Cited by 93
Varieties of responsibility: two problems of responsible innovation
van de Poel, I., & Sand, M. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01951-7 · Cited by 92
“Thewell-knownCollingridge dilemma (Collingridge 1980) with respect to technological development postulates that in the early phases of innovation innovations are usually still malleable (so the freedom condition is met) but the social consequences are often unknown (the knowledge condition is not met).”
Background
Climate geoengineering: issues of path‐dependence and socio‐technical lock‐in
Cairns, R. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.296 · Cited by 96
Can we have a general theory of financial innovation processes? A conceptual review
Khraisha, T., & Arthur, K. N. A. (2018) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-018-0088-y · Cited by 94
Ethical Assurance:A Practical Approach to the Responsible Design, Development, and Deployment of Data-Driven Technologies
Burr, C., & Leslie, D. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00178-0 · Cited by 116
Opening Up the Politics of Knowledge and Power in Bioscience
Stirling, A. (2012) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001233 · Cited by 88
Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies
Kulve, H. T., & Rip, A. (2011) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9304-0 · Cited by 85
Sentiment Analysis of the News Media on Artificial Intelligence Does Not Support Claims of Negative Bias Against Artificial Intelligence
Garvey, C. K., & Maskal, C. (2019) · OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2019.0078 · Cited by 96
COVID-19 Digital Health Innovation Policy: A Portal to Alternative Futures in the Making
Bayram, M., Springer, S., Garvey, C. K., & Özdemir, V. (2020) · OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2020.0089 · Cited by 91
Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation
Grünwald, A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_2 · Cited by 81
Governing solar geoengineering research as it leaves the laboratory
Parker, A. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0173 · Cited by 78
“5See Collingridge [40] for an account of the ‘control dilemma’, where the characteristics of a technology that might need specific governance are not clear until the technology is sufficiently widespread and locked-in, and governance measures are harder to apply.”
Background
Science, Precaution, and the Politics of Technological Risk
Stirling, A. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1399.011 · Cited by 81
Engaging publics about environmental and technology risks: frames, values and deliberation
Pidgeon, N. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1749118 · Cited by 77
Open Engagement: Exploring Public Participation in the Biosciences
Marris, C., & Rose, N. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000549 · Cited by 77
Governing climate risks in the face of normative uncertainties
Taebi, B., Kwakkel, J. H., & Kermisch, C. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.666 · Cited by 88
Toward anticipatory governance of human genome editing: a critical review of scholarly governance discourse
Nelson, J. P., Selin, C. L., & Scott, C. T. (2021) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1957579 · Cited by 83
A forensics of wishing: technology assessment in the age of technoscience
Nordmann, A. (2010) · Poiesis & Praxis · doi:10.1007/s10202-010-0081-7 · Cited by 76
Why does urban Artificial Intelligence (AI) matter for urban studies? Developing research directions in urban AI research
Caprotti, F., Cugurullo, F., Cook, M., Karvonen, A., Marvin, S., Mc̱Guirk, P., & Valdez, M. (2024) · Urban Geography · doi:10.1080/02723638.2024.2329401 · Cited by 74
Inside the Politics of Technology : Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society
Harbers, H. (2005) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789053567562 · Cited by 74
Reflexive governance in biobanking: on the value of policy led approaches and the need to recognise the limits of law
Laurie, G. T. (2011) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-011-1066-x · Cited by 73
“Biobanks are a paradigm example of the so-called ‘Collingridge dilemma’ faced by regulators and legislators: attempts to intervene too early in a technology trajectory mean that insufficient information is available on which to act, yet to wait can mean that technologies become entrenched and influence and change beco…”
Background
Strategic Intelligence on Emerging Technologies: Scientometric Overlay Mapping
Rotolo, D., Ràfols, I., Hopkins, M. M., & Loet Leydesdorff, A. (2015) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1502660.v2 · Cited by 70
Solar Geoengineering and Democracy
Horton, J. B., Reynolds, J. L., Buck, H. J., Callies, D. E., Schäfer, S., Keith, D. W., & Rayner, S. (2018) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00466 · Cited by 71
Exploring Expertise: Issues and Perspectives
Faulkner, W., Fleck, J., & Williams, R. (1998) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-13693-3_1 · Cited by 71
Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
Jongsma, K. R., & Bredenoord, A. L. (2020) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-020-00524-z · Cited by 74
“The question about the right time of assessment and intervention of a technological development, has been debated since Collingridge introduced his famous dilemma [16].”
Background
Fundamental Issues Regarding the Nature of Technology
Pleasants, J., Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., & Miller, G. L. (2019) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-019-00056-y · Cited by 70
Digital platforms and responsible innovation: expanding value sensitive design to overcome ontological uncertainty
de Reuver, M., van Wynsberghe, A., Janssen, M., & van de Poel, I. (2020) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09537-z · Cited by 66
“Second, extending VSD to the entire life cycle is a way to address to so-called Collingridge dilemma (Collingridge 1980).”
Method
Anticipation Work
Steinhardt, S. B., & Jackson, S. J. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675298 · Cited by 68
Reframing the governance of automotive automation: insights from UK stakeholder workshops
Cohen, T., Stilgoe, J., & Cavoli, C. (2018) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1495030 · Cited by 65
Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies at the lab scale: The case of nanowire‐based solar cells
Pallas, G., Vijver, M. G., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12855 · Cited by 65
Adaptive Governance for Responsible Innovation
Lee, R. G., & Petts, J. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118551424.ch8 · Cited by 65
Governance of new product development and perceptions of responsible innovation in the financial sector: insights from an ethnographic case study
Asante, K., Owen, R., & Williamson, G. (2014) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882552 · Cited by 64
Mediating artificial intelligence developments through negative and positive incentives
Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., Lenaerts, T., & Santos, F. C. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244592 · Cited by 66
“This is the case for many kinds of technological races especially when data about the effect of a new technology is usually lacking and only becomes available when it has been created and used enough (see the Collingridge Dilemma [48]), as are the cases of the domain supremacy race through AI [18,19] and the race for…”
Method
The Dark Side of the Moon: The Internet of Things, Industry 4.0, and The Quantified Planet
Özdemir, V. (2018) · OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2018.0143 · Cited by 59
What is ELSA genomics?
Zwart, H. A. E., & Nelis, A. (2009) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2009.115 · Cited by 58
“In more advanced phases, however, societal effects might become clearer, but there is also less room for adaptation and change (Collingridge, 1980).”
Background
From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification
Saltelli, A., & Fiore, M. D. (2020) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00557-0 · Cited by 60
“Whatever course society takes it will have to contend with the pessimism of the Collingridge dilemma (Collingridge, 1980): it is arduous to control a technology, as it is impossible to know in advance its negative effects, and when the consequences become evident, it might be too late to intervene.”
Background
The objects of technology assessment. Hermeneutic extension of consequentialist reasoning
Grünwald, A. (2019) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1647086 · Cited by 57
Rethinking societal engagement under the heading of Responsible Research and Innovation: (novel) requirements and challenges
Bauer, A., Bogner, A., & Fuchs, D. (2021) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1909812 · Cited by 55
Approaches to implement safe by design in early product design through combining risk assessment and Life Cycle Assessment
Subramanian, V., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., Vijver, M. G., Blanco, C. F., Cucurachi, S., & Guinée, J. B. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137080 · Cited by 60
A Sociotechnical Framework for Governing Climate Engineering
Bellamy, R. (2015) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915591855 · Cited by 56
Governing with ambivalence: The tentative origins of socio-technical integration
Fisher, E. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.010 · Cited by 59
Applying ethics to AI in the workplace: the design of a scorecard for Australian workplace health and safety
Cebulla, A., Szpak, Z. L., Howell, C., Knight, G., & Hussain, S. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01460-9 · Cited by 65
The integrated ethics and society programme of the Human Brain Project: reflecting on an ongoing experience
Aicardi, C., Reinsborough, M., & Rose, N. (2017) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1331101 · Cited by 54
Responsibility through Anticipation? The ‘Future Talk’ and the Quest for Plausibility in the Governance of Emerging Technologies
López, S. U. (2021) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-021-00408-5 · Cited by 60
Hitting a moving target: digital transformation and welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare
Frennert, S. (2019) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1642393 · Cited by 52
Collingridge’s dilemma and technoscience
Liebert, W., & Schmidt, J. C. (2010) · Poiesis & Praxis · doi:10.1007/s10202-010-0078-2 · Cited by 51
Prospective techno-economic and life cycle assessment: a review across established and emerging carbon capture, storage and utilization (CCS/CCU) technologies
Wang, P., Robinson, A. J., & Papadokonstantakis, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2024.1412770 · Cited by 67
Text mining of information resources to inform Forecasting Innovation Pathways
Guo, Y., Ma, T., Porter, A. L., et al. (2012) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.715491 · Cited by 50
The New Anticipatory Governance Culture for Innovation: Regulatory Foresight, Regulatory Experimentation and Regulatory Learning
Ahern, D. (2025) · European Business Organization Law Review · doi:10.1007/s40804-025-00348-7 · Cited by 52
Solar Geoengineering: Social Science, Legal, Ethical, and Economic Frameworks
Flegal, J. A., Hubert, A., Morrow, D. R., & Moreno‐Cruz, J. (2019) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030032 · Cited by 49
To Regulate or Not: A Social Dynamics Analysis of an Idealised AI Race
Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., Santos, F. C., & Lenaerts, T. (2020) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12225 · Cited by 57
What has the Trolley Dilemma ever done for us (and what will it do in the future)? On some recent debates about the ethics of self-driving cars
Wolkenstein, A. (2018) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-018-9456-6 · Cited by 44
“Thus, given pluralism and the Collingridge Dilemma, we face a situation that is characterized by the impossibility of “doing ethics right” before releasing a technology.”
BackgroundInfluential
Challenges in Using Big Data to Develop Decision Support Systems for Social Work in Germany
Schneider, D., & Seelmeyer, U. (2019) · Journal of Technology in Human Services · doi:10.1080/15228835.2019.1614513 · Cited by 44
Towards a prospective technology assessment: challenges and requirements for technology assessment in the age of technoscience
Liebert, W., & Schmidt, J. C. (2010) · Poiesis & Praxis · doi:10.1007/s10202-010-0079-1 · Cited by 42
Measuring the Quality of Life: A Sociological Invention Concerning the Application of Economics to Health Care
Mulkay, M., Ashmore, M., & Pinch, T. (1987) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038587021004004 · Cited by 42
Anticipating change : sustainable water policy pathways for an uncertain future
Haasnoot, M. (2013) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036535595 · Cited by 42
Logic of Choice or Logic of Care? Uncertainty, Technological Mediation and Responsible Innovation
Groves, C. (2015) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-015-0238-x · Cited by 41
On Robots and Insurance
Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., Pagliai, T., Morachioli, A., Acerbi, G., Trieste, L., Cavallo, F., Turchetti, G., & Dario, P. (2016) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0345-z · Cited by 45
Personalized medicine beyond genomics: alternative futures in big data—proteomics, environtome and the social proteome
Özdemir, V., Dove, E. S., Gürsoy, U. K., Şardaş, S., YILDIRIM, A., Yılmaz, Ş. G., Barlas, O., Güngör, K., Mete, A., & Srivastava, S. (2015) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-015-1489-y · Cited by 41
A Delphi Technology Foresight Study: Mapping Social Construction of Scientific Evidence on Metagenomics Tests for Water Safety
Birko, S., Dove, E. S., & Özdemir, V. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129706 · Cited by 39
Power and knowledge
Innerárity, D. (2013) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/1368431012468801 · Cited by 39
Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended
Waelbers, K. (2008) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9098-x · Cited by 42
Machine Learning, Social Learning and the Governance of Self-Driving Cars
Stilgoe, J. (2017) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2937316 · Cited by 376

Authors: Mayne, A. J.
Venue: Journal of the Operational Research Society
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 1982-08
Volume: 33
Issue: 8
Pages: 771-772
ISSN: 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
1476-9360
DOI: 10.2307/2634327
OpenAlex: W4299913095
Cited by: 577
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 2 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 15
FWCI: 9.89
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations: Journal of the Operational Research Society (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords: social control, technology, technology regulation, social control of technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Social Control of Technology

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks