Cited by 211Higher Education Governance and DevelopmentEducation and Public PolicyEducational Assessment and Improvement

The Changing Face of Accountability: Monitoring and Assessing Institutional Performance in Higher Education

Alexander, F. King·2000·The Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

F. King Alexander, The Changing Face of Accountability: Monitoring and Assessing Institutional Performance in Higher Education, The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 71, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 2000), pp. 411-431

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2649146

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, F. K.
Corresponding author
Alexander, F. King
Venue
The Journal of Higher Education
Published
2000-07
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
411
ISSN
0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4252531462
Cited by
211
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
FWCI
15.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
institutional accountability, higher education institutions, institutional evaluation, performance monitoring, higher education governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review