The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advantageous Selection in Insurance Markets
Open accessAbstract
This article reverses the standard conclusion that asymmetric information plus competition results in insufficient insurance provision. Risk-tolerant individuals take few precautions and are disinclined to insure, but they are drawn into a pooling equilibrium by the low premiums created by the presence of safer, more risk-averse types. Taxing insurance drives out the reckless clients, allowing a strict Pareto gain. This result depends on administrative costs in processing claims and issuing policies, as does the novel finding of a pure-strategy, partial-pooling, subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium in the insurance market. Copyright 2001 by the RAND Corporation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
Unrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information
Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. (1976) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1885326 · Cited by 4,987
The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers
Roll, R. (1986) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/296325 · Cited by 3,751
A model of insurance markets with incomplete information
Wilson, C. (1977) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(77)90004-7 · Cited by 1,035
Testing for Asymmetric Information in Insurance Markets
Chiappori, P., & Salanie, B. (2000) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/262111 · Cited by 1,013
Overinsurance and Public Provision of Insurance: The Roles of Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection
Pauly, M. V. (1974) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1881793 · Cited by 707
Unrealistic Optimism: Present and Future
Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (1996) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.1 · Cited by 522
The Borrower's Curse: Optimism, Finance and Entrepreneurship
de Meza, D., & Southey, C. (1996) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2235253 · Cited by 398
Self-citationAn Empirical Examination of Information Barriers to Trade in Insurance
Cawley, J., & Philipson, T. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.4.827 · Cited by 355
Cited by
Estimating Risk Preferences from Deductible Choice
Cohen, A., & Einav, L. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.3.745 · Cited by 708
Observing Unobservables: Identifying Information Asymmetries With a Consumer Credit Field Experiment
(2009) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta5781 · Cited by 503
Selection in Insurance Markets: Theory and Empirics in Pictures
Einav, L., & Finkelstein, A. (2011) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.25.1.115 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- de Meza, D., & Webb, D. C.
- Venue
- The RAND Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249
- ISSN
- 0741-6261 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976598038
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advantageous Selection in Insurance Markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2696408
- The paper
- de Meza, D., & Webb, D. C. (2001). Advantageous Selection in Insurance Markets. The RAND Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.