Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,640Innovation and Knowledge ManagementFirm Innovation and GrowthManagement and Organizational Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION.

Katila, R., Ahuja, G.·2002·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.2307/3069433
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We examine how firms search, or solve problems, to create new products. According to organizational learning research, firms position themselves in a unidimensional search space that spans a spectrum from local to distant search. Our findings in the global robotics industry suggest that firms' search efforts actually vary across two distinct dimensions: search depth, or how frequently the firm reuses its existing knowledge, and search scope, or how widely the firm explores new knowledge.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3069433

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 3,640

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
ORCID
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2002-12-01
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1183-1194
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.2307/3069433
OpenAlex
W2040793419
Cited by
3,640
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 196 · 2025: 176 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 208 · 2021: 228 · 2020: 207 · 2019: 213 · 2018: 200 · 2017: 215 · 2016: 198 · 2015: 214 · 2014: 220 · 2013: 232 · 2012: 192
FWCI
52.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
new product launch, search behavior, organizational learning, search depth, knowledge reuse, knowledge exploration, robotics industry, longitudinal study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.