Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Quality of Retrospective Data: An Examination of Long-Term Recall in a Developing Country

Beckett, Megan, Vanzo, Julie Da, Sastry, Narayan, Panis, Constantijn, Peterson, Christine·2001·The Journal of Human Resources

Abstract

Megan Beckett, Julie Da Vanzo, Narayan Sastry, Constantijn Panis, Christine Peterson, The Quality of Retrospective Data: An Examination of Long-Term Recall in a Developing Country, The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Summer, 2001), pp. 593-625

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3069631

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
Beckett, M., Vanzo, J. D., Sastry, N., Panis, C., & Peterson, C.
Venue
The Journal of Human Resources
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2001
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
593
ISSN
0022-166X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1558807052
Cited by
225
References
2
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Quality of Retrospective Data: An Examination of Long-Term Recall in a Developing Country. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3069631
The paper
Beckett, M., Vanzo, J. D., Sastry, N., Panis, C., & Peterson, C. (2001). The Quality of Retrospective Data: An Examination of Long-Term Recall in a Developing Country. The Journal of Human Resources. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069631

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.