Cited by 659Digital Platforms and EconomicsMerger and Competition AnalysisBanking stability, regulation, efficiency

Cooperation among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations

Rochet, Jean-Charles, Tirole, Jean·2002·The RAND Journal of Economics

Abstract

We analyze platforms in two-sided markets with network externalities, using the specific context of a payment card association. We study the cooperative determination of the interchange fee by member banks. The interchange fee is the ``access charge'' paid by the merchants' banks (the acquirers) to cardholders' banks (the issuers). We develop a framework in which banks and merchants may have market power and consumers and merchants decide rationally on whether to buy or accept a payment card. After drawing the welfare implications of a cooperative determination of the interchange fee, we describe in detail the factors affecting merchant resistance, compare cooperative and for-profit business models, and make a first cut in the analysis of system competition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3087474

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If serving consumers and merchants is perfectly competitive, then the interchange fee does not affect the profits of the member banks.

    “However, as Rochet and Tirole (2002) point out, if serving consumers and merchants is perfectly competitive, then the interchange fee does not affect the profits of the member banks.”

    From The Economics of Two-Sided Markets (2009) · cites this paper as Rochet and Tirole (2002)

  • If there is no antitrust violation in setting interchange fees but the equilibrium outcome diverges from the social optimum, then price regulation may be a reasonable solution.

    “If there is no antitrust violation in setting interchange fees but the equilibrium outcome diverges from the social optimum (as in Rochet and Tirole, 2002), then price regulation may be a reasonable solution.”

    From The Economics of Two-Sided Markets (2009) · cites this paper as Rochet and Tirole, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J.
Affiliations
Toulouse School of Economics (FR)
Venue
The RAND Journal of Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
549
ISSN
0741-6261 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025987251
Cited by
659
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 39
FWCI
96.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The RAND Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Keywords
interchange fees, two-sided markets, network effects, access charges, market power, cooperative business models, system competition, payment card adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review