Cited by 119Digital Platforms and EconomicsGame Theory and Voting SystemsGame Theory and Applications

NEGATIVE INTRA‐GROUP EXTERNALITIES IN TWO‐SIDED MARKETS*

Open access
Belleflamme, Paul, Toulemonde, Eric·2009·International Economic Review

Abstract

Two types of agents interact on a pre‐existing free platform. Agents value positively the presence of agents of the other type but may value negatively the presence of agents of their own type. We ask whether a new platform can find fees and subsidies so as to divert agents from the existing platform and make a profit. We show that this might be impossible if intra‐group negative externalities are sufficiently (but not too) strong with respect to positive inter‐group externalities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00529.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belleflamme, P., & Toulemonde, E.
Affiliations
Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Belleflamme, Paul
Venue
International Economic Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-28
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
245-272
ISSN
  • 0020-6598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2354
OpenAlex
W2145966759
Cited by
119
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
32.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository of the University of Namur (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
two-sided markets, platform competition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review