The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sample Size Effects on Chi Square and Other Statistics Used in Evaluating Causal Models
Abstract
William O. Bearden, Subhash Sharma, Jesse E. Teel, Sample Size Effects on Chi Square and Other Statistics Used in Evaluating Causal Models, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, Special Issue on Causal Modeling (Nov., 1982), pp. 425-430
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800313 · Cited by 13,287
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment
Bagozzi, R. P. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800312 · Cited by 778
Cited by
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 · Cited by 16,280
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003) · Department of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau · doi:10.23668/psycharchives.12784 · Cited by 8,975
Practical issues in structural modeling
BENTLER, P. M., & CHOU, C.-P. (1987) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004 · Cited by 5,804
An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001 · Cited by 2,906
Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics
Iacobucci, D. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003 · Cited by 2,263
Baker, J., Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Voss, G. B. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.2.120.18470 · Cited by 2,257
Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1 · Cited by 1,307
Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models
GERBING, D. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002002 · Cited by 1,046
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058 · Cited by 999
Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007 · Cited by 906
Self-citationPerceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination
Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579670 · Cited by 890
Robustness Studies in Covariance Structure Modeling: An Overview and a Meta-Analysis
HOOGLAND, J. J., & BOOMSMA, A. (1998) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124198026003003 · Cited by 734
An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use
Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.011 · Cited by 722
Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework.
Netemeyer, R. G., Johnston, M. W., & Burton, S. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.148 · Cited by 492
Bahadur, W., Aziz, S., & Zulfiqar, S. (2018) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2018.1491780 · Cited by 126
Psychometric properties of the Caregiver Preparedness Scale in caregivers of stroke survivors
Pucciarelli, G., Savini, S., Byun, E., Simeone, S., Barbaranelli, C., Vela, R. J., Alvaro, R., & Vellone, E. (2014) · Heart & Lung · doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.08.004 · Cited by 84
Hawkins, D., Sofronoff, K., & Sheffield, J. (2009) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-008-9209-7 · Cited by 76
Willoughby, J. F., & Myrick, J. G. (2016) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1153764 · Cited by 66
Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., Chaput, J.-P., Goldfield, G. S., Janssen, I., Wang, J., Hamilton, H. A., Ferro, M. A., & Colman, I. (2021) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0706743720970863 · Cited by 39
Rogers, A. H., Garey, L., Bakhshaie, J., Viana, A. G., Ditre, J. W., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2020) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000870 · Cited by 19
Mak, W. W. S., Chan, R. C. H., & Yau, S. S. W. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.047 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Bearden, W. O., Sharma, S., & Teel, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 425
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318764207
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
