Language Testing in Practice

Kenyon, Dorry M., Bachman, Lyle F., Palmer, Adrian S.·1998·The Modern Language Journal

DOI 10.2307/328718

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/328718

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation
MACINTYRE, P. D., CLÉMENT, R., DÖRNYEI, Z., & NOELS, K. A. (1998) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x · Cited by 2,171
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
INCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Loewen, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050163 · Cited by 381
Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amu059 · Cited by 297
Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward
Ellis, R. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000179 · Cited by 267
Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks
Ellis, R. (2019) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818765315 · Cited by 211
A Review of Mobile Language Learning Applications: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
Heil, C. R., Wu, J. S., Lee, J. J., & Schmidt, T. (2016) · The EuroCALL Review · doi:10.4995/eurocall.2016.6402 · Cited by 167
Dimensions of difference: a comparison of university writing and IELTS writing
Moore, T., & Morton, J. (2005) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.001 · Cited by 135
Enhancing writing pedagogy with learner corpus data
Cotos, E. (2014) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344014000019 · Cited by 132
Exploring the construct of interactional oral fluency: Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing approaches
Sato, M. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.05.004 · Cited by 37
The effect of dynamic assessment on complexity, accuracy, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production
Ebrahimi, E. (2015) · International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning · doi:10.5861/ijrsll.2015.982 · Cited by 10

Authors: Kenyon, D. M., Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
Venue: The Modern Language Journal
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 1998
Volume: 82
Issue: 1
Pages: 143
ISSN: 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/328718
OpenAlex: W2320386680
Cited by: 2,323
References: 0
FWCI: 219.61
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 6452 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review