Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts

Kunnan, Antony John, Hamp-Lyons, Liz·1993·The Modern Language Journal

DOI 10.2307/328948

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/328948

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482
Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task
Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00046-7 · Cited by 383
Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section
Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002 · Cited by 352
Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students' writing
Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90033-3 · Cited by 267
Dimensions of difference: a comparison of university writing and IELTS writing
Moore, T., & Morton, J. (2005) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.001 · Cited by 135
Untitled work
(2008) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 101
Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing
Diab, N. M. (2011) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001 · Cited by 90
Marking as judgment
Brooks, V. (2012) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671520903331008 · Cited by 45
The impact of essay organization and overall quality on the holistic scoring of EFL writing: Perspectives from classroom english teachers and national writing raters
Li, J., & Huang, J. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100604 · Cited by 31

Authors: Kunnan, A. J., & Hamp-Lyons, L.
Venue: The Modern Language Journal
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 1993
Volume: 77
Issue: 2
Pages: 229
ISSN: 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/328948
OpenAlex: W1996441519
Cited by: 363
References: 0
FWCI: 55.51
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review