The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research
Abstract
Research on time in organizations spans disciplines and introduces a wide range of concepts. Here we set out to find an underlying structure to clarify the current state of temporal research. Our examination yields three categories of variables: conceptions of time, mapping activities to time, and actors relating to time. We elaborate intricacies within each category, interrelationships among categories, and assumptions made in each category about the others. We then use the framework to compare existing studies and generate propositions to develop the notion of temporal fit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Cited by
Carlile, P. R. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094 · Cited by 3,101
Nahum-Shani, I., Smith, S. N., Spring, B. J., Collins, L. M., Witkiewitz, K., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8 · Cited by 2,171
The dynamics of proactivity at work
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · Cited by 2,057
Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work.
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636 · Cited by 2,006
Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/3560246 · Cited by 870
Self-citationA century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.
Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000128 · Cited by 593
Relationships at Work: Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Dyadic Work Relationships
Ferris, G. R., Liden, R. C., Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Basik, K. J., & Buckley, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309344741 · Cited by 411
Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close
Wilson, J. M., Boyer O'Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607083105 · Cited by 366
A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change
Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612463319 · Cited by 304
My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams
Saunders, C., Van Slyke, C., & Vogel, D. R. (2004) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.2004.12691177 · Cited by 213
Hecht, T. D., & Allen, N. J. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.004 · Cited by 199
It’s about time: New perspectives and insights on time management
Aeon, B., & Aguinis, H. (2017) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0166 · Cited by 197
O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.13 · Cited by 191
Does time management work? A meta-analysis
Aeon, B., Faber, A., & Panaccio, A. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245066 · Cited by 172
McClean, S. T., Barnes, C. M., Courtright, S. H., & Johnson, R. E. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0081 · Cited by 132
Criteria Issues and Team Effectiveness
Mathieu, J. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 2 · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0027 · Cited by 34
O'Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2322710 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 512
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169838530
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
