Cited by 393Innovation and Knowledge ManagementTeam Dynamics and PerformanceKnowledge Management and Sharing

Redundant, overlapping organization: A Japanese approach to managing the innovation process

Nonaka, Ikujiro·1990·California Management Review

Abstract

Innovation is not simply accepting a given problem or task and solving it in a methodical, reductionist manner. Rather, innovation is an and knowledgecreative process that is realized through the generation and definition of the problem or task to be solved. Research on the innovation process in Japanese organizations has shown that these and knowledge-creating characteristics are, to a large degree, a product of what can be termed information redundancy. Information redundancy refers to a condition where various types of excess or supplemental are shared among a group in addition to the minimal amount of requisite each individual, department, or organization holds as necessary to perform assigned, specialized functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/41166615

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procedural memory involves skills or routines and often represents tacit knowledge for individuals and organizations.

    “Thus, the procedural memory involves skills or routines, often represents tacit knowledge for individuals and organizations (Cohen & Bacdayan, 1994;Cohen, 1991;Nonaka, 1990;Winter, 1987).”

    From Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory (2020) · cites this paper as Nonaka, 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nonaka, I.
Corresponding author
Nonaka, Ikujiro
Venue
California Management Review
Published
1990-04
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
27-38
ISSN
  • 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-8564
OpenAlex
W2338941342
Cited by
393
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
19.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
California Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
innovation process, information redundancy, Japanese organizations, knowledge production, problem formulation, organizational structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review