Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett

Matthei, Edward H., Cooper, William E., Walker, Edward C. T.·1980·Language

DOI 10.2307/413521

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/413521

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236
Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259
Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure
Elman, J. L. (1991) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00114844 · Cited by 1,354
The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(85)90017-8 · Cited by 418
Neural representations and mechanisms for the performance of simple speech sequences
Bohland, J. W., Bullock, D., & Guenther, F. H. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21306 · Cited by 393
“də,” an example of a simple exchange error that obeys syllable position constraints as noted in previous studies (e.g. MacKay, 1970; Shattuck-Hufnagel, 1979).”
Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model
MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90048-9 · Cited by 373
Monitoring the Time Course of Phonological Encoding
Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1014 · Cited by 286
The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1985) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(85)90026-9 · Cited by 210
SECOND‐LANGUAGE ACQUISITION FROM A FUNCTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE: PRAGMATIC, SEMANTIC, AND PERCEPTUAL STRATEGIES*
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42009.x · Cited by 122
Errors in Inner Speech
Dell, G. S., & Repka, R. J. (1992) · Experimental Slips and Human Error · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_10 · Cited by 71
Error biases in inner and overt speech: evidence from tongue twisters
Corley, M., Brocklehurst, P. H., & Moat, H. S. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0021321 · Cited by 70

Authors: Matthei, E. H., Cooper, W. E., & Walker, E. C. T.
Venue: Language
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1980-12
Volume: 56
Issue: 4
Pages: 915
ISSN: 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/413521
OpenAlex: W2026578629
Cited by: 777
References: 0
FWCI: 7.59
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review