The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beta Diversity on Geographic Gradients in Britain
Abstract
1. We measured beta diversity, or turnover in species composition, in each of 15 taxa (including plants, vertebrates and invertebrates), along two common transects: N-S and W-E arrays of 50 x 50km squares across Britain. Comparing taxa, we asked whether high beta diversity is associated with poor powers of dispersal. Within taxa, we asked whether turnover increases consistently with geographic distance. 2. Beta diversity on this scale was found to be low in all groups. Total (transect) species richness increased by only 3-13% per 50 x 50km square, relative to the average value of local (within-square) richness; or by 0-6-6% per square, relative to the maximum value of local richness. Among taxa, beta diversity showed no tendency to be higher in poorer dispersers. 3. In nearly all taxa, beta diversity as defined by Whittaker (1960) increased linearly with distance on the N-S transect. However, this was shown to be largely the effect of gradients in alpha (local, within-square) diversity. Moreover, distance is highly correlated with environmental (climatic) dissimilarity, providing an alternative explanation for distance effects. 4. We conclude that in the British biota, turnover at this scale is more the product of range and habitat restriction than of dispersal limitation; and that turnover is a relatively minor component of regional diversity, because of the predominance of strong gradients in alpha diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes ‐ eight hypotheses
Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J. M., Rand, T. A., Didham, R. K., Fahrig, L., Batáry, P., Bengtsson, J., Clough, Y., Crist, T. O., Dormann, C. F., et al. (2012) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00216.x · Cited by 2,134
Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity
Legendre, P. (2014) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12207 · Cited by 1,115
Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal
Pausas, J. G., & Austin, M. P. (2001) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3236601 · Cited by 558
Wetland creation in agricultural landscapes: Biodiversity benefits on local and regional scales
Thiere, G., Milenkovski, S., Lindgren, P.-E., Sahlén, G., Berglund, O., & Weisner, S. E. B. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.006 · Cited by 207
Thomaz, S. M., Souza, D. C., & Bini, L. M. (2003) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1023/b:hydr.0000007300.78143.e1 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, S., Ross, S. J., & Lawton, J. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.2307/5518
- OpenAlex
- W2326289858
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beta Diversity on Geographic Gradients in Britain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/5518
- The paper
- Harrison, S., Ross, S. J., & Lawton, J. H. (1992). Beta Diversity on Geographic Gradients in Britain. The Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/5518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.