Cited by 59Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

A Generative Model of Mathematics Learning

Wittrock, M. C.·1974·Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/748845

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wittrock, M. C.
Corresponding author
Wittrock, M. C.
Venue
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Published
1974-11
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
181
ISSN
0021-8251 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4212791721
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
24.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
generative models, mathematics learning, cognitive models of learning, mathematical cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review