CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133Educational Games and GamificationEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

3D Role-Playing Games as Language Learning Tools

Open access
Rankin, Yolanda, Gold, Rachel, Gooch, Bruce·2006·The Eurographics Association
DOI 10.2312/eged.20061005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Leveraging the experiential cognition and motivational factors of 3D games, we conduct a pilot study that utilizes Ever Quest 2 as pedagogical learning tool for English as a second language (ESL) students. We combine the benefits of massive multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs) and second language methodology to create a digital learning environment for second language acquisition (SLA). Rather than using traditional computerassisted language learning (CALL) software, we explore the immersive, virtual environment of Ever Quest 2 as ESL participants assume virtual identities and engage in social interactions within the game world. We suggest that language becomes a crucial artifact for character development and completion of game tasks in the virtual world. Preliminary results demonstrate that Ever Quest 2 intermediate and advanced ESL students increase their English vocabulary by 40% as result of game play interactions with non-playing characters (NPCs). Furthermore, intermediate and advanced ESL students practice their conversational skills with playing characters (PCs), generating a 100% increase in chat messages during eight sessions of game play. These results lead to the conclusion that MMORPGs can provide motivation and adequate language learning support for intermediate and advanced ESL students.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.2312/eged.20061005

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study is the first (of size) to specifically zoom in on the relation between the types of games played and L2 vocabulary.

    “While some have suggested that MMOs may be more beneficial for L2 learning than other types of games (e.g., Peterson, 2012; Rankin et al., 2006), to my knowledge, this study is the first (of size) to specifically zoom in on the relation between the types of games played and L2 vocabulary.”

    From Commercial-off-the-shelf games in the digital wild and L2 learner vocabulary (2019) · cites this paper as Rankin et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Rankin, Y., Gold, R., & Gooch, B.
ORCID
Venue
The Eurographics Association
Publisher
The Eurographics Association
Published
2006
Pages
33-38
DOI
10.2312/eged.20061005
OpenAlex
W2259752226
Cited by
131
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Eurographics
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
massive multiplayer online role-playing games, English as a second language, second language acquisition, game-based language learning, virtual identity, vocabulary acquisition, conversation skills, computer-assisted language learning, student motivation, immersive virtual environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review