Cited by 25Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignTactile and Sensory Interactions

Determining the Accessibility of Mobile Screen Readers for Blind Users

Open access
Kuber, Ravi, Hastings, Amanda, Tretter, Matthew, Fitzpatrick, Dónal·2012·Imaging and Signal Processing in Health Care and Technology / 772: Human-Computer Interaction / 773: Communication, Internet and Information Technology

Abstract

As mobile interfaces are often designed with sighted users in mind, difficulties can be experienced by individuals who are blind, when using a mobile screen reader to access content. In this paper, we describe a data gathering study to determine the day-to-day challenges experienced when performing tasks using mobile screen readers. Challenges can be faced when gaining an overview of specific document types, processing multiple streams of audio, when performing complex web-based tasks, and instances where the device is accessed while the user is in motion. The findings provide an insight into the needs of diverse users, which can help to inform the design of inclusive mobile applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2316/p.2012.772-003

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 14 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    2 of the novice users described the cognitive burden managing the content from the interface, and listening to commands from the screen reader itself.

    “2 of the novice users described the cognitive burden managing the content from the interface, and listening to commands from the screen reader itself.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Challenges can be faced when gaining an overview of specific document types using mobile screen readers.

    “Challenges can be faced when gaining an overview of specific document types, processing multiple streams of audio, when performing complex web-based tasks, and instances where the device is accessed while the user is in motion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Participants specifically highlighted that distracters (e.g. repeated information and unlabeled images) could cause annoyance due to time being wasted when performing tasks.

    “Participants specifically highlighted that distracters (e.g.repeated information and unlabeled images) could cause annoyance due to time being wasted when performing tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Challenges can be faced when processing multiple streams of audio using mobile screen readers.

    “Challenges can be faced when gaining an overview of specific document types, processing multiple streams of audio, when performing complex web-based tasks, and instances where the device is accessed while the user is in motion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    6 intermediate/expert users stated that third party applications (e.g. games, mobile TV and FM radio) were typically difficult to interact with, as screen reading solutions (e.g. Talks) were unable to effectively translate graphically-oriented cues (e.g. controls) into speech.

    “6 intermediate/expert users stated that they found that third party applications (e.g.games, mobile TV and FM radio) were typically difficult to interact with, as screen reading solutions (e.g.Talks) were unable to effectively translate graphically-oriented cues (e.g.controls) into speech.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 42
  • May combine two claims. 18
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    One participant described issues viewing PDF documents using Talks on a Nokia N82 handset.

    “One participant described issues viewing PDF documents using Talks on a Nokia N82 handset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Reasons for participants' screen reader selection depended on recommendations received from other blind users, compatibility of the screen reader with their existing mobile device, the cost of screen reading software, and whether any level of training would be offered.

    “Reasons for their selection depended on the following factors: recommendations received from other blind users, compatibility of the screen reader with their existing mobile device, the cost of screen reading software, and whether any level of training would be offered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Novice users reported experiencing challenges accessing the calendar functionality, using the on-screen help and accessing the camera to take photos for sighted family and friends.

    “Novice users also reported experiencing challenges accessing the calendar functionality, using the on-screen help and accessing the camera to take photos for sighted family and friends.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although all participants had previous experience of using screen readers, only thirty participants currently used them.

    “Although all had previous experience of using screen readers, only thirty participants currently used them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    5 of the 26 legally blind participants using assistive technologies were currently using touch screen mobile devices.

    “5 of the 26 legally blind participants using assistive technologies were currently using touch screen mobile devices (including the Apple iPhone 8 , HTC TouchPro2 9 and HTC XV6800”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    4 intermediate users described specific difficulties associated with web browsing, including gaining overviews of lengthy text-heavy web pages, and changing system modes to explore online forms and enter information into form boxes using the virtual cursor.

    “4 intermediate users described specific difficulties associated with web browsing.These included gaining overviews of lengthy text-heavy web pages, and changing system modes to explore online forms and enter information into form boxes, using the virtual cursor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The majority of participants interviewed used either MobileSpeak (11 participants) or Talks (12 participants) as their primary screen reader.

    “The majority of participants interviewed used either MobileSpeak (11 participants) or Talks (12 participants) as their primary screen reader.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    26 of the participants described themselves as legally blind, and 6 described themselves as partially-sighted where they were unable to rely completely on their residual vision.

    “26 of the participants who described themselves as legally blind, and 6 described themselves as partiallysighted where they were unable to rely completely on their residual vision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    No participants were found using devices developed specifically for the blind community (e.g. Braille based devices or screenless phones).

    “No participants were found using devices developed specifically for the blind community (e.g.Braille based devices or screenless phones).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The study interviewed 32 participants from multiple countries including the United States, Canada, India, and the United Kingdom.

    “A total of 32 participants (20 male, 16 female) were interviewed from multiple countries including the United States, Canada, India, and the United Kingdom.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Responses tended to vary depending on the make of screen reader, and the users' experience interacting with the software.

    “Responses tended to vary depending on the make of screen reader, and the users' experience interacting with the software.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Problems accessing calendar, on-screen help and camera were attributed to the inappropriate presentation of speech-based feedback, making it challenging to identify changes to system state and system events.

    “Problems were attributed to the inappropriate presentation of speech-based feedback, making it challenging to identify changes to system state and system events.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although some sites were slow to access, participants suggested that some mobile sites were easier to navigate and contained less extraneous information compared with their PC equivalents (e.g. Facebook Mobile).

    “Although some sites were slow to access, participants suggested that some mobile sites were easier to navigate and contained less extraneous information compared with their PC equivalents (e.g.Facebook Mobile”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    This enabled the participant to bypass extraneous information.

    “This would enable the participant to bypass extraneous information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When asked to rate their mobile screen reader skill level, 9 participants rated themselves as beginner, 12 as intermediate, and 11 as expert users.

    “When asked to rate their mobile screen reader skill level as beginner, intermediate, or advanced, participants rated themselves as follows: 9 at beginner level where basic functionality was accessed or they were learning how to use screen readers, 12 participants as intermediate, and 11 as expert users where advanced features of screen readers were often used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While participants suggested it was possible to use a key-press phone while in motion, the case would be different using a touch screen phone.

    “While participants suggested that it was possible to use a key-press phone while in motion, the case would be different using a touch screen phone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When asked about strategies for locating objects on the interface, participants had tried to simplify the process by arranging icons in order of common usage, or using different navigational styles to traverse content.

    “When asked about their strategies for locating objects on the interface, it appeared that the participants had tried to simplify the process by arranging icons in order of common usage, or using different navigational styles to traverse content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The 5 touch screen phone users rated themselves as intermediate or advanced users.

    “The 5 touch screen phone users rated themselves as intermediate or advanced users.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    More salient cues were requested to gain the user's attention, especially within inhospitable environments or when walking and vibrations could not be detected.

    “More salient cues were requested, to gain the user's attention, especially within inhospitable environments or when walking and vibrations could not be detected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The participant stated that this workaround was not perfect, as he would sometimes overshoot important information by positioning his finger on the 'virtual key' for long periods of time.

    “While this offered an alternative to using gestures (e.g. a sliding movement), the participant stated that this workaround was not perfect, as he would sometimes overshoot important information by positioning his finger on the 'virtual key' for long periods of time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inbuilt screen readers were not rated highly, as their functionality was not thought to parallel third party products.

    “Inbuilt screen readers were not rated highly, as their functionality was not thought to parallel third party products.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Only one participant mentioned the need for integrating Braille with more mobile phones.

    “Only one participant mentioned the need for integrating Braille with more mobile phones.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Another participant commented that when a phone call was received while reading a web page, once the call ended, the screen reader cursor would jump to the beginning of the web page.

    “Another participant commented that when a phone call was received while reading a web page, once the call had ended, the screen reader cursor would jump to the beginning of the web page.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Similar to Kane et al. [10], participants suggested the idea of a system which was aware of the environment and context of use.

    “Similar to Kane et al. [10], participants suggested the idea of a system which was aware of the environment and context of use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] 10. D. McGookin, S.A. Brewster & W. Jiang. Investigating touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments. Proc. NordiCHI'08, 2008, 298-307. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Many advanced users praised the universal accessibility of the iPhone.

    “Many of advanced users questioned praised the universal accessibility of the iPhone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    There were worries that background noise from real-world environments may impact perception of the results.

    “Although there were worries that background noise from real-world environments may impact perception of the results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A need was expressed to integrate location finding applications with more accessible mapping tools.

    “A need was expressed to integrate location finding applications with more accessible mapping tools.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants would ordinarily lower audio from mobile applications to make screen reader output audible, but this was not always possible.

    “Participants would ordinarily lower audio from the mobile applications to make screen reader output audible, but this was not always possible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    24 participants additionally suggested that caller details should be presented more effectively, where the privacy of the caller would not be compromised, for example presented in an alternative format to speech.

    “24 participants additionally suggested that caller details should be presented more effectively, where the privacy of the caller would not be compromised (e.g.presented in an alternative format to speech).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    18 participants suggested that a system which enabled them to navigate unfamiliar environments would be very helpful to gain independence.

    “18 participants suggested that a system which enabled them to navigate unfamiliar environments would be very helpful to gain independence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A general theme of frustration was detected due to the limited choice in accessible mobile devices, and that third party screen readers were only compatible with certain handsets, which may not be available within the user's local area.

    “A general theme of frustration was detected due to the limited choice in accessible mobile devices, and that third party screen readers were only compatible with certain handsets, which may not be available within the user's local area.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A need was identified for providing more awareness of spatial position on the page and bookmarking areas on the interface for future access.

    “A need was identified for providing more awareness of spatial position on the page, and bookmarking areas on the interface for future access.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Participants were generally excited about the development of applications which could aid users gain an overview of the wider environment.

    “Participants were generally excited about the development of applications which could aid users gain an overview of the wider environment (e.g. the Siri 13 application, where the user voices a question about his/her location or places within close reach).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Participants suggested presenting summaries of content to help users identify whether a page or application was useful to read in its entirety.

    “Suggestions included the presentation of summaries of content, to help users identify whether the page or application was useful to read in its entirety.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    5 advanced users had previous experience of using touch screens.

    “5 advanced users had previous experience of using touch screens.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    One participant used the 'joystick' mode to quickly scan content by keeping his finger depressed on a section of the touch screen interface corresponding to the direction of movement.

    “For example, one participant who had used a Nokia touch screen device with MobileSpeak used the 'joystick' mode to quickly scan content, by keeping his finger depressed on a section of the touch screen interface which corresponded to the direction of movement (termed a 'virtual key').”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Novice users were less likely to customize verbosity, favoring longer speech-based output, anxious that key content would be missed if speech output was condensed.

    “However, novice users suggested that they were less likely to customize verbosity, favoring the longer speechbased output, anxious that key content would be missed, if speech output was condensed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Some gestures were thought to be more complex compared to gestures made by sighted users when interacting with the phone.

    “However, some of these gestures were thought to be more complex, compared to the gestures made by sighted users when interacting with the phone (e.g. two or three fingers used).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The 'snowball effect' recruitment enabled the study to capture data from individuals who were less 'tech-savvy' when using a mobile phone with screen reader.

    “This enabled us to also capture data from individuals were less 'tech-savvy' when using a mobile phone with screen reader.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent WebAIM study revealed that 66.7% of participants surveyed used mobile screen readers, with larger numbers of novices utilizing these technologies.

    “A recent study by WebAIM [20] revealed that 66.7% of participants surveyed used mobile screen readers, with larger numbers of novices utilizing these technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Barriers to mobile access can be attributed to the design of content on the graphical user interface coupled with restrictions of assistive technologies.

    “Barriers to mobile access can be attributed to the design of content on the graphical user interface, coupled with restrictions of assistive technologies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Menus can contain as many as 12 items, buried within hierarchies four levels deep.

    “According to St. Amant et al. [16], menus can contain as many as 12 items, buried within hierarchies four levels deep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites St. Amant et al. [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Providing access to a handset is required by law in some countries.

    “Providing access to a handset is not only a matter of good practice by manufacturers, it is required by law in some countries [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] 17. T. Watanabe, M. Miyagi, K. Minatani & H. Nagaoka. A survey on the use of mobile phones by visually impaired persons in Japan. Proc. ICCHP '08, 2008, 1081-1084. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The emergence of screen readers on devices such as the Apple iPhone have gone some way towards alleviating the lack of positional awareness of objects on the interface.

    “However, the emergence of screen readers on devices such as the Apple iPhone have gone some way towards alleviating the lack of positional awareness of objects on the interface, discussed later in the paper.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The case is more complex for individuals who are blind, who use assistive technologies such as screen readers to translate visual content into an accessible format.

    “The case is more complex for individuals who are blind, who use assistive technologies (e.g.screen readers) to translate the visual content in to an accessible format.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Deep menu hierarchies can be cumbersome to traverse.

    “and deep menu hierarchies [16] which can be cumbersome to traverse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] 16. The World in 2011: ICT facts & figures. International Telecommunications Union. Available: http://www.itu.int/

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Navigation through an interface can be cumbersome because users are forced to move sequentially item-by-item until they reach their intended target, placing additional demands on the user's memory.

    “Navigation through an interface can be cumbersome, as users are forced to move sequentially item-by-item until they reach their intended target, placing additional demands on the user's memory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    If graphical icons on the mobile screen are inappropriately labelled or are not accessible via the screen reader, it can lead to problems gaining an overview of interface content.

    “If graphical icons on the mobile screen are inappropriately labelled, or are not accessible via the screen reader, it can lead to problems gaining an overview of interface content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Due to the lack of positional awareness of objects on mobile interfaces, blind users may need to be shown the locations of on-screen items by a sighted person, or may require an alternative accessible interface; in the worst case, they may be completely unable to use the device.

    “Due to the lack of positional awareness of objects on mobile interfaces, Kane et al. [7] suggest that blind users may need to be shown the locations of on-screen items by a sighted person, or may require an alternative accessible interface.In the worst case scenario, they may be completely unable to use the device [7].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kane et al. [7] 7. S.K. Kane, J.P. Bigham & J.O. Wobbrock. Slide Rule: Making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. Proc. ASSETS'08, 2008, 73-80.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The auditory presentation can lead to the formation of a representation which is linear, rather than the rich, spatial layout presented on a phone.

    “The auditory presentation can lead to the formation of a representation which is linear, rather than the rich, spatial layout presented on a phone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    While difficulties continue to be faced with inaccessible content, processing multiple streams of audio and remembering interface layout, participants were able to overcome specific challenges using workarounds.

    “While difficulties continue to be faced with inaccessible content, processing multiple streams of audio and remembering interface layout, participants were able to overcome specific challenges using workarounds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 32 participants are representative of blind mobile screen reader users more broadly.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The low mention of Braille integration could be explained by Braille not being the preferred medium of all users.

    “However, this could be explained by Braille not being the preferred medium of all users [2,12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] 2. I. Bruce, A. McKennell, & E. Walker. Blind and partially sighted adults in Britain: the RNIB Survey. HMSO, 1991.
    • cites [12] 12. M.M. Rana. The innovative design and development of web services for visually impaired. Unpublished DPhil Thesis, Anglia Ruskin University, UK.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A study by Rana [13] has shown that 90% of problems interacting with interfaces using assistive technologies can be addressed by using advanced hardware technologies and through training or professional coaching.

    “A study by Rana [13] has shown that 90% of problems interacting with interfaces using assistive technologies can be addressed by using advanced hardware technologies and through training or professional coaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] 13. M.M. Rana & U. Rana. Accessibility evaluation of iPhone's user interface for visually impaired. Proc. IASTED IMSA'09, 2009, 164-167.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Due to limitations in the size and form factor of mobile devices, and the lack of a full sized keyboard, ensuring that commands are identical between a PC and a phone is impractical.

    “However, we recognize that, due to the limitations in the size and form factor of mobile devices, and the lack of a full sized keyboard, ensuring that commands are identical between a PC and a phone is impractical.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
54 of 54
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Previous research has focused on improving the physical handset rather than on problems faced using mobile screen readers themselves.

    “While previous studies have focused on improving the design of the physical handset to ensure that the user is able to gain access to the phone, research has yet to concentrate on the problems faced using mobile screen readers themselves.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    On some key-press mobile devices, longer text messages sent to the recipient are split into multiple messages.

    “On some key-press mobile devices, longer text messages sent to the recipient would be split into multiple messages.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 32 participants are representative of blind mobile screen reader users more broadly.

    “The findings from the study, provide a first step into developing inclusive mobile applications to bridge the 'disability divide'.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported gender counts exceed the sample size

    Minor

    The reported 20 male and 16 female participants total 36, not the stated 32.

    Reported 32 · recomputed 36

  • ITU estimate cites the WebAIM bibliography entry

    Minor

    The text attributes the subscription estimate to the International Telecommunications Union at reference 18, but reference 18 is WebAIM. The ITU entry is numbered 16.

  • WebAIM citation number differs from its bibliography entry

    Minor

    The text cites WebAIM as reference 20, whereas its bibliography entry is numbered 18.

  • Kane citation points to McGookin

    Minor

    The text attributes reference 10 to Kane et al., but the bibliography assigns reference 10 to McGookin et al.

  • Rana citation points to Smith-Jackson

    Minor

    The text cites Rana and Rana as reference 14, but reference 14 lists Smith-Jackson et al. Rana and Rana are listed at reference 13.

  • St. Amant citation points to the ITU entry

    Minor

    The text cites St. Amant et al. as reference 16, but reference 16 is the ITU publication. St. Amant et al. are listed at reference 15.

  • Smith-Jackson citation points to St. Amant

    Minor

    The text assigns Smith-Jackson et al. reference 15, but reference 15 lists St. Amant et al.; Smith-Jackson et al. are listed at reference 14.

7 of 7

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]3. D. Burton. Talk me through it: a review of two cell phone-based screen readers. AFB Accessworld 8, 1 2007.
  2. [12]12. M.M. Rana. The innovative design and development of web services for visually impaired. Unpublished DPhil Thesis, Anglia Ruskin University, UK.
  3. [13]13. M.M. Rana & U. Rana. Accessibility evaluation of iPhone's user interface for visually impaired. Proc. IASTED IMSA'09, 2009, 164-167.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuber, R., Hastings, A., Tretter, M., & Fitzpatrick, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
  • Dublin City University (IE)
Venue
Imaging and Signal Processing in Health Care and Technology / 772: Human-Computer Interaction / 773: Communication, Internet and Information Technology
Publisher
ACTAPRESS
Published
2012
OpenAlex
W2146038712
Cited by
25
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Funders
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
blind users, accessibility, assistive technology, audio streams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review