Cited by 23Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchProbiotics and Fermented FoodsReproductive tract infections research

Inhibitory effect of Lactococcus lactis on the bioactivity of periodontopathogens

Open access
Shin, Hyun-Seung, Baek, Dong-Heon, Lee, Sung-Hoon·2018·The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology

Abstract

Lactococcus lactis is a probiotic bacterium that produces various bacteriocins. Periodontopathogens induce inflammation and halitosis through the actions of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and trypsin-like enzymes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the inhibitory effects of L. lactis on the bioactivity of periodontopathogens. To investigate the antimicrobial peptide of L. lactis, the spent culture medium (SCM) of L. lactis was treated with or without proteinase K after collection by centrifugation, and the antibacterial activity of SCM against periodontopathogens was assessed. To evaluate the neutralizing effect of L. lactis on halitosis, SCM of periodontopathogens was mixed with an L. lactis suspension, and the levels of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) were measured by gas chromatography. LPS from the periodontopathogens was extracted by an LPS extraction kit with little modification, and THP-1 cells as a monocytic cell line were treated with the extracted LPS in the presence or absence of UV-killed L. lactis. The production of inflammatory cytokines was analyzed by ELISA. The SCM of L. lactis exhibited antimicrobial activity against the periodontopathogens, whereas the proteinase K-treated SCM showed little antimicrobial activity. In addition, the L. lactis suspension had a neutralizing effect on the VSCs produced by periodontopathogens, and UV-killed L. lactis inhibited the production of IL-6 and TNF-α induced by the LPS. These results suggest that L. lactis may be a useful probiotic to prevent and treat periodontitis and halitosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2323/jgam.2017.06.003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Postbiotics of Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus salivarius, and Lactococcus lactis can suppress the growth of opportunistic or pathogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola.

    “The postbiotics of Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus salivarius, and Lactococcus lactis can suppress the growth of opportunistic or pathogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola [11,12].”

    From Analysis of Chemical Structure and Antibiofilm Properties of Exopolysaccharides from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum EIR/IF-1 Postbiotics (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Discussion reports that spent culture medium from Lactococcus lactis inhibited growth of F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, and T. forsythia; T. denticola was more resistant. The paper does not establish the claimed effects for Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Streptococcus sanguinis, or Streptococcus mutans. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hecht, D. W., Citron, D. M., Cox, M., Jacobus, N., Jenkins, S. G. et al. (2007) Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaero- bic bacteria; Approved standard-Seventh edition (M11-A7), Clini- cal and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  2. Socransky, S. S. and Haffajee, A. D. (2005) Periodontal microbial ecol- ogy. Periodontol. 2000, 38, 135-187.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, H.-S., Baek, D.-H., & Lee, S.-H.
Affiliations
Dankook University (KR)
Venue
The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology
Published
2018
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
55-61
ISSN
  • 0022-1260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-8037
OpenAlex
W2791070863
Cited by
23
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2016R1C1B2007335)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
Lactococcus lactis, periodontal pathogens, probiotics, bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides, spent culture medium, volatile sulfur compounds, halitosis, lipopolysaccharide, inflammatory cytokines, interleukin-6, TNF-α, periodontitis, trypsin-like enzymes
MeSH terms
THP-1 Cells, Antibiosis, Bacteria, Humans, Lipopolysaccharides, Periodontitis, Lactococcus lactis, Sulfur Compounds, Cytokines, Culture Media, Conditioned, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Probiotics, Volatile Organic Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review