Cited by 29Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchProbiotics and Fermented FoodsPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Outside the limits of bacterial viability: Postbiotics in the management of periodontitis

Moraes, Renata Mendonça, Schlagenhauf, Ulrich, Anbinder, Ana Lia·2022·Biochemical Pharmacology

Abstract

Periodontitis is a major cause of tooth loss in adults worldwide and is caused by an unbalanced oral microbiota in a susceptible host, ultimately leading to tissue breakdown and bone loss. Traditionally, the treatment for periodontitis is scaling and root planing; however, some cases require adjuvant therapy, such as antibiotics administration or surgery. Various factors are involved in the pathogenesis and interact in an unpredictable way, increasing the complexity of the disease and making it difficult to manage. In this context, the administration of probiotics aimed at resolving bacterial dysbiosis and the associated dysregulation of the immune system has been employed in clinical trials with encouraging results. However, the use of viable microorganisms is not risk-free, and immunocompromised patients may develop adverse effects. Therefore, the use of inactivated microbial cells, cell fractions, or soluble products and metabolites of probiotics, known as postbiotics, has gained increasing attention. In this commentary, we present the current literature assessing the impact of postbiotics on the growth and metabolism of periodontal pathogens, as well as on the progression of periodontitis in rodents and humans. We also discuss the limitations of the available data and what the scientific community should consider in order to transfer this innovative therapeutic modality from the bench to the bedside.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115072

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A safer and more practical approach than live probiotics would be to use inactivated microbial cells, cell fractions, or soluble products and metabolites of probiotics, known as postbiotics.

    “A safer and more practical approach would be to use inactivated microbial cells, cell fractions, or soluble products and metabolites of probiotics, known as postbiotics [12–14].”

    From Coaggregation of oral pathogens by postbiotic lactobacilli (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moraes, R. M., Schlagenhauf, U., & Anbinder, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Anbinder, Ana Lia
Venue
Biochemical Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
201
Pages
115072
ISSN
0006-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225326951
Cited by
29
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2017/26461-5, 2018/25933-3, 2018/21701-0)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
postbiotics, periodontitis, probiotics, periodontal pathogens, oral microbiota dysbiosis, periodontal disease progression, immunocompromised patients, adjuvant therapy, scaling and root planing, periodontal bone loss, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Humans, Periodontitis, Root Planing, Probiotics, Microbial Viability, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review