Cited by 164Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBirth, Development, and Health

A 20-Year Prospective Study of Childbearing and Incidence of Diabetes in Young Women, Controlling for Glycemia Before Conception

Open access
Gunderson, Erica P., Lewis, Cora E., Tsai, Ai-Lin, Chiang, Vicky, Carnethon, Mercedes, Quesenberry, Charles P., Sidney, Stephen·2007·Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—We sought to determine whether childbearing increases incidence of type 2 diabetes after accounting for preconception glycemia and gestational glucose intolerance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A prospective, biracial cohort was examined up to five times during 1985–2006 in the multicenter, U.S. population–based Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. The analysis included 2,408 women (1,226 black and 1,182 white) aged 18–30 years who were free of diabetes and had a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <126 mg/dl at baseline. Incident diabetes was diagnosed by self-report, diabetes medication use, FPG ≥126 mg/dl, and/or plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl after a 2-h oral glucose load. Time-dependent interim birth groups were those with zero and those with one or more births with or without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), stratified by baseline parity. Complementary log-log models estimated relative hazards of incident diabetes by interim births adjusted for age, race, family history of diabetes, and baseline covariates (FPG, BMI, education, smoking, and physical activity). RESULTS—Of 193 incident diabetes cases in 42,782 person-years (4.5 cases/1,000 person-years), 84 (44%) had one or more interim births. Among nulliparas at baseline, incident rates per 1,000 person-years were 3.2 (95% CI 2.4–4.1) for those with no births, 2.9 (1.8–3.9) for one or more births without GDM, and 18.4 (10.9–25.9) for one or more births with GDM; adjusted relative hazards (95% CI) were 0.9 (0.6–1.4) for one or more births without GDM and 3.8 (2.2–6.6) for one or more births with GDM versus no births. CONCLUSIONS—Childbearing did not elevate diabetes incidence among those with normal glucose tolerance during pregnancy (without GDM). GDM conferred the highest risk of developing diabetes independent of family history of diabetes and preconception glycemia and obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db07-1024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH: Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 25:1862-1868, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunderson, E. P., Lewis, C. E., Tsai, A.-L., Chiang, V., Carnethon, M., Quesenberry, C. P., & Sidney, S.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2007-12-01
Volume
56
Issue
12
Pages
2990-2996
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2151682843
Cited by
164
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95095-66-0-1, n01hc48050-59-0-1, n01hc48048-58-0-1, n01hc48047-55-0-1, n01hc48049-61-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01HC48050, N01 HC 95095, N01 HC048048, N01-HC-048049, N01 HC095095, N01 HC048050, N01-HC48048, N01-HC-48-049, N01 HC048047, N01-HC-480-47)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01DK059944)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
type 2 diabetes incidence, childbearing, parity, gestational diabetes mellitus, young women, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study, black and white women
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Coronary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Patient Selection, Black People, White People, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review