Cited by 169Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchRetinal Diseases and Treatments

12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023

Open access
ElSayed, Nuha A., Aleppo, Grazia, Aroda, Vanita R., Bannuru, Raveendhara R., Brown, Florence M., Bruemmer, Dennis, Collins, Billy S., Gibbons, Christopher H. +15 more·2023·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc23-s012

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a single randomized clinical trial of 94 patients, hyperbaric oxygen therapy improved healing at 1 year compared with sham (61% vs 27%; P = .009).

    “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy Adjunct therapy in neuroischemic or ischemic diabetic foot ulcers when standard of care alone has failed Improved healing in a single randomized clinical trial of 94 patients receiving hyperbaric oxygen therapy vs sham at 1 year (61% vs 27%; P = .009),70”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Treatment section reports one positive randomized trial with increased healing at 12 months compared with controls. It does not give the trial size, identify the control as sham, or report the 61% versus 27% rates or P = .009, so those specifics are not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Gibbons, C. H., Giurini, J. M., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E. L., Kahan, S., Khunti, K., Leon, J., Lyons, S. K., Perry, M. L., Prahalad, P., Pratley, R. E., Seley, J. J., Stanton, R. C., Sun, J. K., & Gabbay, R. A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2022-12-12
Volume
46
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S203-S215
ISSN
0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311158230
Cited by
169
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 37
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic foot care, diabetes complications, clinical guidelines, quality of care
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Endocrinology, Humans, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Reference Standards, Retinal Diseases, Societies, Medical, Standard of Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review