Cited by 72Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCancer Risks and Factors

Lactation Duration and Midlife Atherosclerosis

Open access
Gunderson, Erica P., Quesenberry, Charles P., Ning, Xian, Jacobs, David R., Gross, Myron, Goff, David C., Pletcher, Mark J., Lewis, Cora E.·2015·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate lactation duration in relation to subsequent atherosclerosis in women during midlife. METHODS: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study is a multicenter prospective cohort that enrolled 2,787 women in 1985-1986 (ages 18-30 years, 52% black, 48% white), of whom 2,014 (72%) attended the 20-year follow-up examination in 2005-2006. We selected 846 women (46% black) without heart disease or diabetes at baseline who delivered one or more times after the baseline evaluation, had cardiometabolic risk factors measured at baseline, and had maximum common carotid intima-media thickness (mm) measured at the 20-year follow-up examination in 2005-2006. Lactation duration was summed across all postbaseline births for each woman and (n, women) categorized as: 0 to less than 1 month (n=262), 1 to less than 6 months (n=210), 6 to less than 10 months (n=169), and 10 months or greater (n=205). Multiple linear regression models estimated mean common carotid intima-media thickness (95% confidence interval) and mean differences among lactation duration groups compared with the 0 to less than 1-month group adjusted for prepregnancy obesity, cardiometabolic status, parity, and other risk factors. RESULTS: Lactation duration had a graded inverse association with common carotid intima-media thickness; mean differences between 10 months or greater compared with 0 to less than 1 month ranged from -0.062 mm for unadjusted models (P trend <.001) to -0.029 mm for models fully adjusted for prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and cardiometabolic risk factors, parity, smoking, and sociodemographics (P trend=.010). Stepwise addition of potential mediators (BMI, systolic blood pressure at the 20-year follow-up examination) modestly attenuated the lactation and common carotid intima-media thickness association to -0.027 and -0.023 mm (P trend=.019 and .054). CONCLUSION: Shorter lactation duration is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis independent of prepregnancy cardiometabolic risk factors and traditional risk factors. The magnitude of differences in carotid artery intima-media thickness may represent greater vascular aging. Lactation may have long-term benefits that lower cardiovascular disease risk in women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000000919

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Never breastfed was associated with vascular characteristics (larger arterial lumen and adventitial diameters) linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease independent of sociodemographic characteristics, health related behaviour, family history, and body mass index.

    “never breastfed was associated with vascular characteristics (larger arterial lumen and adventitial diameters) linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease independent of sociodemographic characteristics, health related behaviour, family history, and body mass index”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunderson, E. P., Quesenberry, C. P., Ning, X., Jacobs, D. R., Gross, M., Goff, D. C., Pletcher, M. J., & Lewis, C. E.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2015-08
Volume
126
Issue
2
Pages
381-390
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170166614
Cited by
72
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc48050-59-0-1)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 0005)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201300028C, HHS-N2-68201300029C, HHSN268201300027C, HHSN268200900041C, HHSN268201300026C, HHS-N2-68201300025C, N01 HC048050)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK090047, K01DK059944)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
lactation length, atherosclerosis, subclinical atherosclerosis, carotid intima-media thickness, middle-aged women, postpartum period, pre-pregnancy body mass index, cardiometabolic risk factors, systolic blood pressure, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study, cardiovascular risk factors, parity, smoking, Black women
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, Coronary Artery Disease, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Lactation, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Risk Assessment, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review