Cited by 247Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Teplizumab Preserves C-Peptide in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Hagopian, William, Ferry, Robert J., Sherry, Nicole, Carlin, David, Bonvini, Ezio, Johnson, Syd, Stein, Kathryn E., Koenig, Scott +4 more·2013·Diabetes

Abstract

Protégé was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled 2-year study of three intravenous teplizumab dosing regimens, administered daily for 14 days at baseline and again after 26 weeks, in new-onset type 1 diabetes. We sought to determine efficacy and safety of teplizumab immunotherapy at 2 years and to identify characteristics associated with therapeutic response. Of 516 randomized patients, 513 were treated, and 462 completed 2 years of follow-up. Teplizumab (14-day full-dose) reduced the loss of C-peptide mean area under the curve (AUC), a prespecified secondary end point, at 2 years versus placebo. In analyses of prespecified and post hoc subsets at entry, U.S. residents, patients with C-peptide mean AUC >0.2 nmol/L, those randomized ≤6 weeks after diagnosis, HbA1c <7.5% (58 mmol/mol), insulin use <0.4 units/kg/day, and 8–17 years of age each had greater teplizumab-associated C-peptide preservation than their counterparts. Exogenous insulin needs tended to be reduced versus placebo. Antidrug antibodies developed in some patients, without apparent change in drug efficacy. No new safety or tolerability issues were observed during year 2. In summary, anti-CD3 therapy reduced C-peptide loss 2 years after diagnosis using a tolerable dose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db13-0236

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The earlier Protégé trial did not meet its primary composite endpoint of a significant difference in insulin dose and HbA1c at 1 year; however, teplizumab treatment reduced the loss of C-peptide response to a standard mixed meal at 2 years.

    “The earlier Protégé trial, 33,34 which included children and adults, did not meet its primary composite endpoint of a significant difference in the insulin dose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA₁ c ) concentrations at 1 year; however, teplizumab treatment reduced the loss of Cpeptide response to a standard mixed meal, a prespecified secondary endpoint, at 2 years.34”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

  • Teplizumab has shown promise in preserving insulin secretion in stage 3 type 1 diabetes.

    “Although currently being considered but not yet approved for stage 3 type 1 diabetes, teplizumab has shown promise in preserving insulin secretion (table 1).”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

  • Post-hoc analyses identified subgroups with higher baseline C-peptide, lower insulin use, lower HbA1c, younger age, and shorter time since diagnosis who benefited most from teplizumab treatment, suggesting greater efficacy with early treatment in paediatric populations.

    “Posthoc analyses identified subgroups with higher baseline Cpeptide measurement, lower insulin use, lower HbA₁ C , younger age, and shorter time since diagnosis who benefited most from teplizumab treatment, suggesting greater efficacy with early treatment in paediatric populations.34”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]Steele C Hagopian WA Gitelman S Insulin secretion in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2004; 53: 426– 433 14747294
  2. [2]Binder C Faber OK Residual beta-cell function and its metabolic consequences. Diabetes 1978; 27(Suppl. 1): 226– 229 344113
  3. [4]Madsbad S Alberti KG Binder C Role of residual insulin secretion in protecting against ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes. BMJ 1979; 2: 1257– 1259 117878 PMC1596922
  4. [5]Sherry NA Kushner JA Glandt M Kitamura T Brillantes AM Herold KC Effects of autoimmunity and immune therapy on beta-cell turnover in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2006; 55: 3238– 3245 17130466
  5. [6]Herold KC Hagopian WA Auger JA Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1692– 1698 12037148
  6. [8]Buzzetti R Cernea S Petrone A DiaPep Trialists Group C-peptide response and HLA genotypes in subjects with recent-onset type 1 diabetes after immunotherapy with DiaPep277: an exploratory study. Diabetes 2011; 60: 3067– 3072 21896927 PMC3198071
  7. [9]Herold KC Gitelman S Greenbaum C Immune Tolerance Network ITN007AI Study Group Treatment of patients with new onset Type 1 diabetes with a single course of anti-CD3 mAb Teplizumab preserves insulin production for up to 5 years. Clin Immunol 2009; 132: 166– 173 19443276 PMC2735402
  8. [10]Herold KC Gitelman SE Masharani U A single course of anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody hOKT3gamma1(Ala-Ala) results in improvement in C-peptide responses and clinical parameters for at least 2 years after onset of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2005; 54: 1763– 1769 15919798 PMC5315015
  9. [11]Sherry N Hagopian W Ludvigsson J Protégé Trial Investigators Teplizumab for treatment of type 1 diabetes (Protégé study): 1-year results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 487– 497 21719095 PMC3191495
  10. [12]Lebastchi J Deng S Lebastchi AH Immune therapy and β-cell death in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2013; 62: 1676– 1680 23423576 PMC3636605
  11. [13]Ablamunits V Sherry NA Kushner JA Herold KC Autoimmunity and beta cell regeneration in mouse and human type 1 diabetes: the peace is not enough. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1103: 19– 32 17376841
  12. [14]Greenbaum CJ Beam CA Boulware D Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group Fall in C-peptide during first 2 years from diagnosis: evidence of at least two distinct phases from composite Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet data. Diabetes 2012; 61: 2066– 2073 22688329 PMC3402330
  13. [16]American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes—2011. Diabetes Care 2011; 34(Suppl. 1): S11– S61 21193625 PMC3006050
  14. [17]Hirsch IB, Skyler JS. Chapter 17 – The Management of Type 1 Diabetes. Updated 2009. Available from: http://www.endotext.org/diabetes/diabetes17/diabetesframe17.htm Accessed 5 November 2012
  15. [19]The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Effect of intensive therapy on residual beta-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes in the diabetes control and complications trial. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 517– 523 9518395
  16. [21]Mandrup-Poulsen T IAPP boosts islet macrophage IL-1 in type 2 diabetes. Nat Immunol 2010; 11: 881– 883 20856216
  17. [22]Ludvigsson J Krisky D Casas R GAD65 antigen therapy in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 433– 442 22296077
  18. [23]Beck RW Tamborlane WV Bergenstal RM Miller KM DuBose SN Hall CA T1D Exchange Clinic Network The T1D Exchange clinic registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97: 4383– 4389 22996145
  19. [24]Keymeulen B Vandemeulebroucke E Ziegler AG Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2598– 2608 15972866
  20. [25]Sprangers B Van der Schueren B Gillard P Mathieu C Otelixizumab in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Immunotherapy 2011; 3: 1303– 1316 22053883
  21. [26]Bisikirska B Colgan J Luban J Bluestone JA Herold KC TCR stimulation with modified anti-CD3 mAb expands CD8+ T cell population and induces CD8+CD25+ Tregs. J Clin Invest 2005; 115: 2904– 2913 16167085 PMC1201661
  22. [27]Ablamunits V Bisikirska B Herold KC Acquisition of regulatory function by human CD8(+) T cells treated with anti-CD3 antibody requires TNF. Eur J Immunol 2010; 40: 2891– 2901 21038470 PMC3073342
  23. [28]Keymeulen B Candon S Fafi-Kremer S Transient Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in CD3 monoclonal antibody-treated patients. Blood 2010; 115: 1145– 1155 20007541
  24. [29]Chatenoud L Thervet E Primo J Bach JF Anti-CD3 antibody induces long-term remission of overt autoimmunity in nonobese diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91: 123– 127 8278351 PMC42898
  25. [30]Chatenoud L Primo J Bach J-F CD3 antibody-induced dominant self tolerance in overtly diabetic NOD mice. J Immunol 1997; 158: 2947– 2954 9058834

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagopian, W., Ferry, R. J., Sherry, N., Carlin, D., Bonvini, E., Johnson, S., Stein, K. E., Koenig, S., Daifotis, A. G., Herold, K. C., Ludvigsson, J., & for the Protégé Trial Investigators
Affiliations
  • Pacific Northwest Research Institute (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • MacroGenics (United States) (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Hagopian, William
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2013-10-18
Volume
62
Issue
11
Pages
3901-3908
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2124812894
Cited by
247
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK085465, T35DK007405)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD059292)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
teplizumab, type 1 diabetes, recent-onset type 1 diabetes, anti-CD3 therapy, immunotherapy, antidrug antibodies, predictors of treatment response, HbA1c, pediatric patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, C-Peptide, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Immunotherapy, Insulin, Placebos, Area Under Curve, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review