Cited by 49Regulation of Appetite and ObesityDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

GIPR Function in the Central Nervous System: Implications and Novel Perspectives for GIP-Based Therapies in Treating Metabolic Disorders

Open access
Samms, Ricardo J., Sloop, Kyle W., Gribble, Fiona M., Reimann, Frank, Adriaenssens, Alice E.·2021·Diabetes

Abstract

During the past decade, pharmaceutical engineering of unimolecular agents has revealed the therapeutic potential of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) agonism. From this work, one of the most intriguing findings is that engagement of GIPR enhances the weight loss profile of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)-based therapeutics. Consequently, this pharmacological approach, in combination with novel Gipr mouse models, has provided evidence indicating that activation of GIPR in certain areas of the brain that regulate energy balance is required for the synergistic weight loss of dual GIPR and GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonism. This has led to significant interest in understanding how GIPR activity in the brain functions to reduce caloric intake, induce negative energy balance, and drive weight loss. Herein, we review key findings in this field and provide a novel perspective explaining how GIP may act in the brain to affect energy balance both alone and in concert with GLP-1R agonism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dbi21-0002

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samms, R. J., Sloop, K. W., Gribble, F. M., Reimann, F., & Adriaenssens, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Wellcome/MRC Institute of Metabolic Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Samms, Ricardo J.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2021-06-27
Volume
70
Issue
9
Pages
1938-1944
ISSN
0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175579825
Cited by
49
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (106263/Z/14/Z, 106262/Z/14/Z, MRC_MC_UU_12012/3)
  • Medical Research Council (MRC_MC_UU_12012/3, MC_UU_00014/3, MC_UU_00014/5)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor, GLP-1 receptor, weight loss, energy balance, central nervous system, energy intake, metabolic disorders
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Animals, Brain, Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide, Humans, Metabolic Diseases, Receptors, Gastrointestinal Hormone, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review