Cited by 202Dietary Effects on HealthNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and Diet

Breakfast Frequency and Development of Metabolic Risk

Open access
Odegaard, Andrew O., Jacobs, David R., Steffen, Lyn M., Van Horn, Linda, Ludwig, David S., Pereira, Mark A.·2013·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The relation of breakfast intake frequency to metabolic health is not well studied. The aim of this study was to examine breakfast intake frequency with incidence of metabolic conditions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed an analysis of 3,598 participants from the community-based Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study who were free of diabetes in the year 7 examination when breakfast and dietary habits were assessed (1992-1993) and participated in at least one of the five subsequent follow-up examinations over 18 years. RESULTS: Relative to those with infrequent breakfast consumption (0-3 days/week), participants who reported eating breakfast daily gained 1.9 kg less weight over 18 years (P=0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, there was a stepwise decrease in risk across conditions in frequent breakfast consumers (4-6 days/week) and daily consumers. The results for incidence of abdominal obesity, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and hypertension remained significant after adjustment for baseline measures of adiposity (waist circumference or BMI) in daily breakfast consumers. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for daily breakfast consumption were as follows: abdominal obesity HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.66-0.91), obesity 0.80 (0.67-0.96), metabolic syndrome 0.82 (0.69-0.98), and hypertension 0.84 (0.72-0.99). For type 2 diabetes, the corresponding estimate was 0.81 (0.63-1.05), with a significant stepwise inverse association in black men and white men and women but no association in black women. There was no evidence of differential results for high versus low overall dietary quality. CONCLUSIONS: Daily breakfast intake is strongly associated with reduced risk of a spectrum of metabolic conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc13-0316

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Odegaard, A. O., Jacobs, D. R., Steffen, L. M., Van Horn, L., Ludwig, D. S., & Pereira, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Odegaard, Andrew O.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2013-09-14
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
3100-3106
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2108714592
Cited by
202
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95095-66-0-1, n01hc48050-59-0-1, n01hc48048-58-0-1, n01hc48047-55-0-1, n01hc48049-61-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01HC48050, N01 HC 95095, N01 HC095095, N01 HC048050, N01-HC48048, N01-HC-48-049, N01 HC048047, N01-HC-480-47)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK082730)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
breakfast frequency, metabolic risk, abdominal obesity, obesity, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, weight gain, dietary habits, CARDIA study, racial differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Hypertension, Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Young Adult, Obesity, Abdominal, Breakfast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review