Cited by 387Dietary Effects on HealthNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and Diet

Skipping breakfast: longitudinal associations with cardiometabolic risk factors in the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health Study

Open access
Smith, Kylie J, Gall, Seana L, McNaughton, Sarah A, Blizzard, Leigh, Dwyer, Terence, Venn, Alison J·2010·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background The long-term effects of skipping breakfast on cardiometabolic health are not well understood.Objective The objective was to examine longitudinal associations of breakfast skipping in childhood and adulthood with cardiometabolic risk factors in adulthood.Design In 1985, a national sample of 9-15-y-old Australian children reported whether they usually ate breakfast before school. During follow-up in 2004-2006, 2184 participants (26-36 y of age) completed a meal-frequency chart for the previous day. Skipping breakfast was defined as not eating between 0600 and 0900. Participants were classified into 4 groups: skipped breakfast in neither childhood nor adulthood (n = 1359), skipped breakfast only in childhood (n = 224), skipped breakfast only in adulthood (n = 515), and skipped breakfast in both childhood and adulthood (n = 86). Diet quality was assessed, waist circumference was measured, and blood samples were taken after a 12-h fast (n = 1730). Differences in mean waist circumference and blood glucose, insulin, and lipid concentrations were calculated by linear regression.Results After adjustment for age, sex, and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, participants who skipped breakfast in both childhood and adulthood had a larger waist circumference (mean difference: 4.63 cm; 95% CI: 1.72, 7.53 cm) and higher fasting insulin (mean difference: 2.02 mU/L; 95% CI: 0.75, 3.29 mU/L), total cholesterol (mean difference: 0.40 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.68 mmol/L), and LDL cholesterol (mean difference: 0.40 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.64 mmol/L) concentrations than did those who ate breakfast at both time points. Additional adjustments for diet quality and waist circumference attenuated the associations with cardiometabolic variables, but the differences remained significant.Conclusions Skipping breakfast over a long period may have detrimental effects on cardiometabolic health. Promoting the benefits of eating breakfast could be a simple and important public health message.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.2010.30101

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More frequent daily eating occasions have been associated with a higher diet quality and better appetite control.

    “More frequent daily eating occasions have been associated with a higher diet quality (4) and better appetite control (6) .”
  • Of the nine studies identified that examined associations between skipping breakfast and diet quality, six found a negative association and three found no association.

    “Of the nine studies identified that examined associations between skipping breakfast and diet quality, six found a negative association( 22 , 23 , 86 , 87 , 90 , 94 ) and three found no association( 28 , 91 , 93 ).”
  • Breakfast skipping was consistently inversely associated with diet quality in six out of nine studies, despite the different definitions used (time-of-day and participant-identified), and in some cases no clear definition was provided.

    “Breakfast skipping was consistently inversely associated with diet quality in six out of nine studies, despite the different definitions used (time-of-day( 88 , 94 ) and participant identified( 22 , 23 , 28 , 86 , 90 )), and in some cases, no clear definition was provided( 87 , 93 ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, K. J., Gall, S. L., McNaughton, S. A., Blizzard, L., Dwyer, T., & Venn, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
1316-1325
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110604808
Cited by
387
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 21
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
breakfast skipping, cardiometabolic risk factors, childhood diet, adult diet, waist circumference, fasting insulin, blood glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, diet quality, meal frequency
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Cardiovascular Diseases, Child, Child Behavior, Cholesterol, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Insulin, Life Style, Cholesterol, LDL, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Health Behavior, Metabolic Syndrome, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review