Cited by 206Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Treatment and Management

Update on cardiovascular outcomes at 30 years of the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study

Open access
Lachin, John M., Orchard, Trevor J., Nathan, David M., for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the beneficial long-term effects of an average of 6.5 years of intensive diabetes therapy (INT) in type 1 diabetes on measures of atherosclerosis, cardiac structure and function, and clinical cardiovascular events observed in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The DCCT was a randomized clinical trial of 1,441 participants assigned to receive INT or conventional therapy (CON). It was conducted between 1983–1993 with an average follow-up of 6.5 years. EDIC (1994–present) is an observational follow-up of the DCCT cohort. Cardiovascular events have been recorded throughout. During EDIC common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) was measured with ultrasound, coronary artery calcification with computed tomography, and cardiac structure and function with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: DCCT INT and lower levels of HbA1c during DCCT/EDIC were associated with thinner carotid IMT, less coronary calcification, and a lower incidence of clinical cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiac death. While there were no significant differences in cardiac structure and function between the former INT and CON groups, they were significantly associated with higher HbA1c during DCCT/EDIC. CONCLUSIONS: DCCT INT and the attendant 6.5 years of lower HbA1c had long-term salutary effects on the development and progression of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease during the subsequent follow-up during EDIC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc13-2116

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over the last 25 years, people with type 1 diabetes have seen large drops in microvascular and macrovascular complication risks and better outcomes.

    “In the past 25 years, among people with type 1 diabetes the risks of microvascular and macrovascular compli-cations have substantially decreased and outcomes have improved.125,126”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [125]

    The Introduction and Conclusions (page not specified) report substantial long-term benefits of intensive treatment for both microvascular disease and cardiovascular outcomes in the DCCT/EDIC participants with type 1 diabetes. They do not establish that complication risks declined over the past 25 years among people with type 1 diabetes generally; the comparison is intensive versus conventional treatment, not a population-wide trend over time. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lachin, J. M., Orchard, T. J., Nathan, D. M., & for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Lachin, John M.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2013-12-11
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
39-43
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2172157568
Cited by
206
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 2
FWCI
20.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000041, UL1TR000114, 5u01dk094157-13, UL1TR001449, UL1TR000457)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK094176, U01-DK094157)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, intensive diabetes therapy, cardiovascular outcomes, atherosclerosis, carotid intima-media thickness, coronary artery calcification, HbA1c, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac structure and function, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Calcinosis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Treatment Outcome, Atherosclerosis, Young Adult, Diabetic Cardiomyopathies, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review