Cited by 123Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Type 1 Diabetes and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Escobar-Morreale, Héctor F., Roldán-Martín, M. Belén·2016·Diabetes Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A few small studies have reported increased prevalences of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and symptoms of androgen excess in women with type 1 diabetes. PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating androgen excess symptoms and PCOS in women with type 1 diabetes. DATA SOURCES: The Entrez-PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were used. STUDY SELECTION: We selected studies addressing androgen excess signs, symptoms, and disorders in girls, adolescents, and adult women with type 1 diabetes. DATA EXTRACTION: The main outcome measures were prevalences of PCOS, hyperandrogenemia, hirsutism, menstrual dysfunction, and polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM). DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine primary studies involving 475 adolescent or adult women with type 1 diabetes were included. The prevalences of PCOS and associated traits in women with type 1 diabetes were 24% (95% CI 15-34) for PCOS, 25% (95% CI 17-33) for hyperandrogenemia, 25% (95% CI 16-36) for hirsutism, 24% (95% CI 17-32) for menstrual dysfunction, and 33% (95% CI 24-44) for PCOM. These figures are considerably higher than those reported earlier in the general population without diabetes. LIMITATIONS: The data collected in the original studies were heterogeneous in age, race, ethnicity, and criteria used for the diagnosis of PCOS; yet, we used a quality-effects model in the meta-analyses to overcome this limitation. CONCLUSIONS: PCOS and its related traits are frequent findings in women with type 1 diabetes. PCOS may contribute to the subfertility of these women by a mechanism that does not directly depend on glycemic/metabolic control among other negative consequences for their health. Hence, screening for PCOS and androgen excess should be included in current guidelines for the management of type 1 diabetes in women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc15-2577

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Escobar-Morreale, H. F., & Roldán-Martín, M. B.
Affiliations
Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
Corresponding author
Roldán-Martín, M. Belén
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2016-03-15
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
639-648
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2309792950
Cited by
123
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI1100357, PI1401686)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, hyperandrogenism, hyperandrogenemia, hirsutism, menstrual disorders, polycystic ovary morphology, PCOS prevalence, subfertility, PCOS screening, women with diabetes
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Hyperandrogenism, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review