Cited by 200Ovarian function and disordersAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Adiponectin and resistin in PCOS: a clinical, biochemical and molecular genetic study

Escobar-Morreale, H.F.·2006·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a cross-sectional case-control study to evaluate the possible involvement of adiponectin and resistin in the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Seventy-six PCOS patients and 40 non-hyperandrogenic women matched for BMI and degree of obesity were included. Serum adiponectin and resistin levels, anthropometrical and hormonal variables, the 45 T-->G and 276 G-->T polymorphisms in the adiponectin gene, and the -420 C-->G variant in the resistin gene, were analysed. RESULTS: Serum adiponectin concentrations were reduced in PCOS patients compared with controls (P = 0.038) irrespective of the degree of obesity, whereas serum resistin levels were increased in overweight and obese women compared with lean subjects (P = 0.016), irrespective of their PCOS or controls status. The adiponectin and resistin polymorphisms were not associated with PCOS and did not influence serum levels of adiponectin, resistin and other clinical and hormonal variables. In a multiple regression model, the waist-to-hip ratio, free testosterone levels and age, but not insulin resistance, were the major determinants of hypoadiponectinaemia. CONCLUSIONS: PCOS patients present with hypoadiponectinaemia, in relation with abdominal adiposity and hyperandrogenism. Our present results suggest that hyperandrogenism and abdominal obesity, by reducing the serum levels of the insulin sensitizer adipokine adiponectin, might contribute to the insulin resistance of PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/del146

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Escobar-Morreale, H. F.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES)
Corresponding author
Escobar-Morreale, H.F.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2006-06-03
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
2257-2265
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2129639179
Cited by
200
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 19
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Comunidad de Madrid
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, adiponectin, resistin, hyperandrogenism, abdominal obesity, waist-to-hip ratio, free testosterone, insulin resistance, adiponectin gene polymorphism, adipokines
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Genotype, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Polymorphism, Genetic, Case-Control Studies, Adiponectin, Resistin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review