Cited by 75Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

Metformin, lifestyle intervention, and cognition in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study

Open access
Luchsinger, José A., Ma, Yong, Christophi, Costas A., Florez, Hermes, Golden, Sherita H., Hazuda, Helen, Crandall, Jill, Venditti, Elizabeth +4 more·2017·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the association of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) intervention arms (lifestyle intervention, metformin, and placebo) with cognition in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS). We also examined metformin use, incident type 2 diabetes, and glycemia as exposures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The DPP lasted 2.8 years, followed by a 13-month bridge to DPPOS. Cognition was assessed in DPPOS years 8 and 10 (12 and 14 years after randomization) with the Spanish English Verbal Learning Test (SEVLT), letter fluency and animal fluency tests, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and a composite cognitive score. RESULTS: A total of 2,280 participants (749 lifestyle, 776 metformin, and 755 placebo) aged 63.1 ± 10.7 years underwent cognitive assessments; 67.7% women, 54.6% non-Hispanic white, 20.7% non-Hispanic black, 14.6% Hispanic, 5.5% American Indian, and 4.6% Asian; 26.6% were homozygous or heterozygous for APOE-ε4. At the time of cognitive assessment, type 2 diabetes was higher in the placebo group (57.9%; P < 0.001) compared with lifestyle (47.0%) and metformin (50.4%). Metformin exposure was higher in the metformin group (8.72 years; P < 0.001) compared with placebo (1.43 years) and lifestyle (0.96 years). There were no differences in cognition across intervention arms. Type 2 diabetes was not related to cognition, but higher glycated hemoglobin at year 8 was related to worse cognition after confounder adjustment. Cumulative metformin exposure was not related to cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to intensive lifestyle intervention or metformin was not related to cognition among DPPOS participants. Higher glycemia was related to worse cognitive performance. Metformin seemed cognitively safe among DPPOS participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc16-2376

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies examining the effects of diabetes prevention or intensive glycemic and blood pressure management to achieve specific goals have not demonstrated a reduction in brain function decline.

    “However, studies examining the effects of diabetes prevention or intensive glycemic and blood pressure management to achieve specific goals have not demonstrated a reduction in brain function decline (18,19).”

    From 13. Older Adults: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) report no difference in cognitive performance between diabetes-prevention intervention arms about 12 years after randomization. They also report that an intensive glycemic-control arm in ACCORD-MIND showed no cognitive benefit. The paper does not establish the claim about intensive blood-pressure management, and because it collected no baseline cognitive data, its own finding concerns later cognitive performance rather than a measured reduction in cognitive decline. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies on diabetes prevention or intensive glycemic and blood pressure management have not demonstrated a reduction in cognitive decline.

    “However, studies on diabetes prevention or intensive glycemic and blood pressure management have not demonstrated a reduction in cognitive decline (20,21).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Studies on diabetes prevention or intensive glycemic and blood pressure management have not demonstrated a reduction in cognitive decline.

    “However, studies on diabetes prevention or intensive glycemic and blood pressure management have not demonstrated a reduction in cognitive decline (25,26).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]Biessels GJ, Strachan MW, Visseren FL, Kappelle LJ, Whitmer RA Dementia and cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes and prediabetic stages: towards targeted interventions. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2: 246– 255 24622755
  2. [3]Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 518– 524 9571335
  3. [6]Selkoe DJ The origins of Alzheimer disease: a is for amyloid. JAMA 2000; 283: 1615– 1617 10735401
  4. [7]Imfeld P, Bodmer M, Jick SS, Meier CR Metformin, other antidiabetic drugs, and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a population-based case-control study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60: 916– 921 22458300
  5. [8]González HM, Mungas D, Reed BR, Marshall S, Haan MN A new verbal learning and memory test for English- and Spanish-speaking older people. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2001; 7: 544– 555 11459106
  6. [12]Irie F, Fitzpatrick AL, Lopez OL, Enhanced risk for Alzheimer disease in persons with type 2 diabetes and APOE epsilon4: the Cardiovascular Health Study Cognition Study. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 89– 93 18195144 PMC11070951
  7. [14]Luchsinger JA, Lehtisalo J, Lindström J,.; Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS) Cognition in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015; 108: e63– e66 25799080
  8. [15]Watson GS, Craft S The role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: implications for treatment. CNS Drugs 2003; 17: 27– 45 12467491
  9. [16]Luchsinger JA Type 2 diabetes, related conditions, in relation and dementia: an opportunity for prevention? J Alzheimers Dis 2010; 20: 723– 736 20413862
  10. [18]Uusitupa M, Lindi V, Louheranta A, Salopuro T, Lindström J, Tuomilehto J; Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group Long-term improvement in insulin sensitivity by changing lifestyles of people with impaired glucose tolerance: 4-year results from the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes 2003; 52: 2532– 2538 14514637
  11. [20]Luchsinger JA. Type 2 diabetes, related conditions, in relation to dementia: an opportunity for prevention? J Alzheimers Dis 2010;20:723–736 20413862
  12. [21]Ishibashi Y, Matsui T, Takeuchi M, Yamagishi S. Beneficial effects of metformin and irbesartan on advanced glycation end products (AGEs)-RAGE-induced proximal tubular cell injury. Pharmacol Res 2012;65:297–302 22100460
  13. [22]Ishibashi Y, Matsui T, Takeuchi M, Yamagishi S. Metformin inhibits advanced glycation end products (AGEs)-induced renal tubular cell injury by suppressing reactive oxygen species generation via reducing receptor for AGEs (RAGE) expression. Horm Metab Res 2012;44:891–895 22864903
  14. [23]Haffner S, Temprosa M, Crandall J,.; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Intensive lifestyle intervention or metformin on inflammation and coagulation in participants with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes 2005; 54: 1566– 1572 15855347 PMC1314967
  15. [24]Orchard TJ, Temprosa M, Goldberg R,.; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group The effect of metformin and intensive lifestyle intervention on the metabolic syndrome: the Diabetes Prevention Program randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 611– 619 15838067 PMC2505046
  16. [25]Chen Y, Zhou K, Wang R, Antidiabetic drug metformin (GlucophageR) increases biogenesis of Alzheimer’s amyloid peptides via up-regulating BACE1 transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 3907– 3912 19237574 PMC2656178
  17. [26]Moore EM, Mander AG, Ames D,.; AIBL Investigators Increased risk of cognitive impairment in patients with diabetes is associated with metformin. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 2981– 2987 24009301 PMC3781568
  18. [28]Li J, Deng J, Sheng W, Zuo Z Metformin attenuates Alzheimer’s disease-like neuropathology in obese, leptin-resistant mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2012; 101: 564– 574 22425595 PMC3327803
  19. [29]Hsu CC, Wahlqvist ML, Lee MS, Tsai HN Incidence of dementia is increased in type 2 diabetes and reduced by the use of sulfonylureas and metformin. J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 24: 485– 493 21297276
  20. [32]Hirsch HA, Iliopoulos D, Struhl K Metformin inhibits the inflammatory response associated with cellular transformation and cancer stem cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:972–977 23277563 PMC3549132
  21. [33]Emami Riedmaier A, Fisel P, Nies AT, Schaeffeler E, Schwab M Metformin and cancer: from the old medicine cabinet to pharmacological pitfalls and prospects. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2013;34:126–135 23277337
  22. [34]Lehtisalo J, Lindstrom J, Ngandu T, Diabetes, glycaemia, and cognition- a secondary analysis of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016;32:102–110 26172529
  23. [35]Chalmers J, Cooper ME UKPDS and the legacy effect. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1618– 1620 18843126
  24. [36]Launer LJ, Miller ME, Williamson JD,.; ACCORD MIND investigators Effects of intensive glucose lowering on brain structure and function in people with type 2 diabetes (ACCORD MIND): a randomised open-label substudy. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 969– 977 21958949 PMC3333485

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luchsinger, J. A., Ma, Y., Christophi, C. A., Florez, H., Golden, S. H., Hazuda, H., Crandall, J., Venditti, E., Watson, K., Jeffries, S., Manly, J. J., & Pi-Sunyer, F. X.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2017-06-13
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
958-965
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2612859522
Cited by
75
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01 DK048489)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
metformin, lifestyle intervention, cognition, type 2 diabetes prevention, HbA1c, glycemia, cognitive safety, Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study, APOE ε4
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Cholesterol, Cognition, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Ethnicity, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Life Style, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Triglycerides, Treatment Outcome, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review