Cited by 62Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPhysical Activity and Health

Effect of a long-term intensive lifestyle intervention on cognitive function: Action for Health in Diabetes study

Open access
Rapp, Stephen R., Luchsinger, Jose A., Baker, Laura D., Blackburn, George L., Hazuda, Helen P., Demos‐McDermott, Kathryn E., Jeffery, Robert W., Keller, Jeffrey N. +7 more·2017·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether randomization to 10 years of lifestyle intervention to induce and maintain weight loss improves cognitive function. Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting: Data obtained as part of the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD ) trial ( NCT 00017953) and Look AHEAD Continuation study (U01 DK 057136‐15). Participants: Overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged 45 to 76 (N = 3,751). Intervention: Intensive lifestyle intervention ( ILI ) for weight loss through reduced caloric intake and increased physical activity compared with a control condition of diabetes support and education ( DSE ). Measurements: Certified examiners who were masked to intervention assignment administered a standard battery of cognitive function tests (Modified Mini‐Mental State Examination, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Digit Symbol Coding, Trail‐Making Test, Modified Stroop Color‐Word Test) to participants 10 to 13 years after enrollment. Results: Assignment to lifestyle intervention was not associated with significantly different overall ( P = .10) or domain‐specific (all P > .10) cognitive function than assignment to diabetes support and education. Results were fairly consistent across prespecified groups, but there was some evidence of trends for differential intervention effects showing modest harm in ILI in participants with greater body mass index and in individuals with a history of cardiovascular disease. Cognitive function was not associated with changes in weight or fitness (all P > .05). Conclusion: A long‐term behavioral weight loss intervention for overweight and obese adults with diabetes mellitus was not associated with cognitive benefit. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT 00017953.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.14692

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rapp, S. R., Luchsinger, J. A., Baker, L. D., Blackburn, G. L., Hazuda, H. P., Demos‐McDermott, K. E., Jeffery, R. W., Keller, J. N., McCaffery, J. M., Pajewski, N. M., Evans, M., Wadden, T. A., Arnold, S. E., Espeland, M. A., & the Look AHEAD Research Group
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior Miriam Hospital and Alpert School of Medicine Brown University Providence Rhode Island
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rapp, Stephen R.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-09
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
966-972
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2570701502
Cited by
62
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
intensive lifestyle intervention, cognitive function, type 2 diabetes, weight loss, obesity, diabetes support and education, cognitive decline, body mass index, cardiovascular disease history, Look AHEAD trial
MeSH terms
Aged, Behavior Therapy, Cognition, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Weight Loss, Exercise, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review