Cited by 163Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsFoot and Ankle Surgery

Detection of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot by imaging techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing MRI, white blood cell scintigraphy, and FDG-PET.

Open access
Lauri, Chiara, Tamminga, Menno, Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M., Juárez Orozco, Luis Eduardo, Erba, Paola A., Jutte, Paul C., Lipsky, Benjamin A., IJzerman, Maarten J. +2 more·2017·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Diagnosing bone infection in the diabetic foot is challenging and often requires several diagnostic procedures, including advanced imaging. We compared the diagnostic performances of MRI, radiolabeled white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy (either with 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamineoxime [HMPAO] or 111In-oxine), and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG–PET)/computed tomography. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We searched Medline and Embase as of August 2016 for studies of diagnostic tests on patients known or suspected to have diabetes and a foot infection. We performed a systematic review using criteria recommended by the Cochrane Review of a database that included prospective and retrospective diagnostic studies performed on patients with diabetes in whom there was a clinical suspicion of osteomyelitis of the foot. The preferred reference standard was bone biopsy and subsequent pathological (or microbiological) examination. RESULTS Our review found 6,649 articles; 3,894 in Medline and 2,755 in Embase. A total of 27 full articles and 2 posters was selected for inclusion in the analysis. The performance characteristics for the 18F-FDG–PET were: sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 92%; diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), 95; positive likelihood ratio (LR), 11; and negative LR, 0.11. For WBC scan with 111In-oxine, the values were: sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 75%; DOR, 34; positive LR, 3.6; and negative LR, 0.1. For WBC scan with 99mTc-HMPAO, the values were: sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 92%; DOR, 118; positive LR, 12; and negative LR, 0.1. Finally, for MRI, the values were: sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 75%; DOR, 37; positive LR, 3.66, and negative LR, 0.10. CONCLUSIONS The various modalities have similar sensitivity, but 18F-FDG–PET and 99mTc-HMPAO–labeled WBC scintigraphy offer the highest specificity. Larger prospective studies with a direct comparison among the different imaging techniques are required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc17-0532

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous vascular classifications exist but focus on the degree of ischemia without consideration of tissue loss or infection until the latest stages.

    “Similarly, numerous vascular classifications exist but focus on the degree of ischemia without consideration of tissue loss or infection until the latest stages.38”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Eligible Studies section describes a review of imaging tests for diabetic foot osteomyelitis, not vascular classification systems. Searches for vascular classifications, ischemia, tissue loss, and disease stages found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Wound, Ischemia, Foot Infection (WIfI) classification system was developed and validated as a method to combine wound, ischemia, and foot infection and to accurately assess the risk of limb loss for patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

    “TheWound, Ischemia, Foot Infection (WIfI) classification system was developed and validated as a method to combine all 3 variables (wound, ischemia, and foot infection)and to accurately assess the risk of limb loss for patients with diabetic foot ulcers.38,39”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Abstract discusses diabetic foot infection, osteomyelitis, and amputation, while the Methods assess imaging tests for osteomyelitis. Searches for WIfI and for a classification predicting limb loss found no passage about the system’s development, validation, or predictive accuracy; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A higher score on the WIfI scale is associated with lower extremity amputation and morbidity.

    “a A higher score on the WIfI scale 38 is associated with lower extremity amputation and morbidity and can be used to determine the need for revascularization.”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Abstract discusses diabetic foot osteomyelitis and lower-extremity amputation, but does not discuss WIfI scores or their association with amputation or morbidity. Searches for WIfI scoring and revascularization found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Enderle MD, Coerper S, Schweizer HP, et al. Correlation of imaging techniques to histopathol- ogy in patients with diabetic foot syndrome and clinical suspicion of chronic osteomyelitis. Diabe- tes Care 1999;22:294-299

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lauri, C., Tamminga, M., Glaudemans, A. W. J. M., Juárez Orozco, L. E., Erba, P. A., Jutte, P. C., Lipsky, B. A., IJzerman, M. J., Signore, A., & Slart, R. H. J. A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Slart, Riemer H.J.A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2017-07-11
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
1111-1120
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2738855391
Cited by
163
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
University Medical Center Groningen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
osteomyelitis, diabetic foot, bone infection, magnetic resonance imaging, white blood cell scintigraphy, FDG-PET, 99mTc-HMPAO, 111In-oxine, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic imaging comparison, diabetes complications
MeSH terms
Bone and Bones, Humans, Leukocytes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Osteomyelitis, Radionuclide Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Databases, Factual, Diabetic Foot, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review