Cited by 153Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchCommunity Health and Development

Outcomes at 18 months from a community health worker and peer leader diabetes self-management program for Latino adults.

Open access
Spencer, Michael S., Kieffer, Edith C., Sinco, Brandy, Piatt, Gretchen, Palmisano, Gloria, Hawkins, Jaclynn, Lebron, Alana, Espitia, Nicolaus +3 more·2018·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a community health worker (CHW) diabetes self-management education (DSME) program, followed by two different approaches to maintain improvements in HbA1c and other clinical and patient-centered outcomes over 18 months. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study randomized 222 Latino adults with type 2 diabetes and poor glycemic control from a federally qualified health center to 1) a CHW-led, 6-month DSME program or 2) enhanced usual care (EUC). After the 6-month program, participants randomized to the CHW-led DSME were further randomized to 1) 12 months of CHW-delivered monthly telephone outreach (CHW-only) or 2) 12 months of weekly group sessions delivered by peer leaders (PLs) with telephone outreach to those unable to attend (CHW+PL). The primary outcome was HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were blood pressure, lipid levels, diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, understanding of diabetes self-management, and diabetes social support. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. RESULTS: Participants in the CHW intervention at the 6-month follow-up had greater decreases in HbA1c (−0.45% [95% CI −0.87, −0.03]; P < 0.05) and in diabetes distress (−0.3 points [95% CI −0.6, −0.03]; P < 0.05) compared with EUC. CHW+PL participants maintained HbA1c improvements at 12 and 18 months, and CHW-only participants maintained improvements in diabetes distress at 12 and 18 months. CHW+PL participants also had significantly fewer depressive symptoms at 18 months compared with EUC (−2.2 points [95% CI −4.1, −0.3]; P < 0.05). Participants in CHW-led DSME had significant improvements in diabetes social support and in understanding of diabetes self-management at 6 months relative to EUC, but these intervention effects were not sustained at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a 6-month CHW intervention on key diabetes outcomes and of a volunteer PL program in sustaining key achieved gains. These are scalable models for health care centers in low-resource settings for achieving and maintaining improvements in key diabetes outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc17-0978

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Arnold MS. Using the empowerment approach to help patients change behavior. In Practical Psychology for Diabetes Clinicians. 2nd ed. Anderson B, Rubin RL, and Rubin RR, Eds. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 2003, pp. 3–12 [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, M. S., Kieffer, E. C., Sinco, B., Piatt, G., Palmisano, G., Hawkins, J., Lebron, A., Espitia, N., Tang, T., Funnell, M., & Heisler, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Community Health and Social Services (CHASS), Detroit, MI
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Spencer, Michael S.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2018-04-27
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
1414-1422
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2799449764
Cited by
153
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Association of Family Physicians Foundation (P30-DK-09292)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18-DK-0785501A1)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U50/CCU417409)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
Keywords
community health workers, peer leaders, diabetes self-management education, type 2 diabetes, Latino adults, HbA1c, glycemic control, diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, telephone outreach, peer support groups, resource-limited settings, federally qualified health centers, intervention sustainability
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adult, Aged, Community Health Workers, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Education, Glycated Hemoglobin, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Peer Group, Self Care, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review