Cited by 188Diabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and Research

Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes self-management support: results of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Tang, Tricia S., Funnell, Martha, Sinco, Brandy, Piatt, Gretchen, Palmisano, Gloria, Spencer, Michael S., Kieffer, Edith C., Heisler, Michele·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a peer leader (PL) versus a community health worker (CHW) telephone outreach intervention in sustaining improvements in HbA1c over 12 months after a 6-month diabetes self-management education (DSME) program. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and sixteen Latino adults with type 2 diabetes were recruited from a federally qualified health center and randomized to (1) a 6-month DSME program followed by 12 months of weekly group sessions delivered by PLs with telephone outreach to those unable to attend or (2) a 6-month DSME program followed by 12 months of monthly telephone outreach delivered by CHWs. The primary outcome was HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular disease risk factors, diabetes distress, and diabetes social support. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. RESULTS: After DSME, the PL group achieved a reduction in mean HbA1c (8.2-7.5% or 66-58 mmol/mol, P < 0.0001) that was maintained at 18 months (-0.6% or -6.6 mmol/mol from baseline [P = 0.009]). The CHW group also showed a reduction in HbA1c (7.8 vs. 7.3% or 62 vs. 56 mmol/mol, P = 0.0004) post-6 month DSME; however, it was attenuated at 18 months (-0.3% or -3.3 mmol/mol from baseline, within-group P = 0.234). Only the PL group maintained improvements achieved in blood pressure at 18 months. At the 18-month follow-up, both groups maintained improvements in waist circumference, diabetes support, and diabetes distress, with no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both low-cost maintenance programs led by either a PL or a CHW maintained improvements in key patient-reported diabetes outcomes, but the PL intervention may have additional benefit in sustaining clinical improvements beyond 12 months.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc13-2161

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peer leaders can effectively provide education and support for lifestyle, as demonstrated in a study where 116 Latino adults with T2D were randomized to receive diabetes self-management education and either 12 months of weekly group sessions with peer leaders or 12 months of telephone outreach with health workers; both groups achieved significant HbA1c, blood pressure, and waist circumference

    “Finally, peer leaders can effectively provide education and support for lifestyle.This was demonstrated in a study where 116 Latino adults with T2D were randomized to receive diabetes self-management education and either 12 months of weekly group sessions with peer leaders or 12 months of telephone outreach with health workers (87).Both groups achieved significant HbA 1c , blood pressure, and”

    From The CardioMetabolic Health Alliance (2015) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, T. S., Funnell, M., Sinco, B., Piatt, G., Palmisano, G., Spencer, M. S., Kieffer, E. C., & Heisler, M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Community Health and Social Services Center, Detroit, MI
Corresponding author
Tang, Tricia S.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-05-10
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1525-1534
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2156742166
Cited by
188
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7
FWCI
13.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U50/CCU417409)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18DK0785501A1, P30DK092926)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
peer leaders, community health workers, diabetes self-management education, type 2 diabetes, HbA1c, telephone outreach, Latino adults, diabetes distress, cardiovascular risk factors, blood pressure, waist circumference, federally qualified health centers
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Community Health Workers, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Peer Group, Quality of Life, Self Care, Social Support, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review