Cited by 138Diabetes Management and EducationCommunity Health and DevelopmentNursing Roles and Practices

The role of community health workers in diabetes: update on current literature

Open access
Shah, Megha, Kaselitz, Elizabeth, Heisler, Michele·2013·Current Diabetes Reports

Abstract

Community health worker (CHW) interventions have been found to be a promising strategy for improving diabetes outcomes, especially among low-income and racial and ethnic minority populations. This review serves as an update of the literature published since 2011 on CHWs' role in diabetes care. In our review of the most current literature, we noted several key areas of advancement. These areas include community-based participatory research approaches to intervention development and evaluation, analyses of the cost effectiveness of CHW interventions, evaluation of sustainability through integrated team-based approaches, thorough descriptions of characteristics and training of CHWs, and delineation of the scope of practice and most effective roles for CHWs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11892-012-0359-3

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, M., Kaselitz, E., & Heisler, M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shah, Megha
  • Heisler, Michele
Venue
Current Diabetes Reports
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
163-171
ISSN
  • 1534-4827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0829
OpenAlex
W1982576093
Cited by
138
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Diabetes Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926, P30DK020572)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
Keywords
community health workers, diabetes management, low-income populations, racial and ethnic minorities, community-based participatory research, cost-effectiveness, intervention sustainability, team-based care, CHW training, scope of practice
MeSH terms
Community Health Workers, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Self Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review