Cited by 83Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

A 26-week randomized controlled trial of semaglutide once daily versus liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled on diet and exercise with or without metformin.

Lingvay, Ildiko, Desouza, Cyrus V., Lalic, Katarina S., Rose, Ludger, Hansen, Thomas, Zacho, Jeppe, Pieber, Thomas R.·2018·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of once-daily semaglutide in comparison with once-daily liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This 26-week, multicenter, double-blind trial involved patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes with HbA1c 7.0–10.0% (53–86 mmol/mol) and treated with diet and exercise with or without metformin. Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to once-daily semaglutide, liraglutide, or placebo in one of four volume-matched doses (semaglutide 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg and liraglutide 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg, with both compared within each volume-matched dose group). Primary end point was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. RESULTS: In total, 705 randomized patients were exposed to trial products. At week 26, a dose-dependent change in HbA1c was observed with semaglutide from −1.1% (0.05 mg) to −1.9% (0.3 mg) and with liraglutide from −0.5% (0.3 mg) to −1.3% (1.8 mg) (all P < 0.001 in favor of volume-matched semaglutide dose). Change with pooled placebo was −0.02% (P < 0.0001 vs. semaglutide). Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders were the most common adverse events (AEs) with semaglutide and liraglutide, occurring in 32.8–54.0% and 21.9–41.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily semaglutide at doses up to 0.3 mg/day resulted in greater reductions in HbA1c compared with liraglutide or placebo but with a higher frequency of GI AEs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc17-2381

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lingvay, I., Desouza, C. V., Lalic, K. S., Rose, L., Hansen, T., Zacho, J., & Pieber, T. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
  • Institute for Diabetes Research in Münster, Münster, Germany
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Pieber, Thomas R.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2018-07-19
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
1926-1937
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2884645397
Cited by
81
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
semaglutide, liraglutide, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, GLP-1 receptor agonists, metformin, diet and exercise, dose-response relationship, gastrointestinal adverse effects, placebo comparison
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Semaglutide, Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Placebos, Exercise, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review