Cited by 46Nutritional Studies and DietDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Associations Between Dietary Patterns and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective Cohort Study of 120,343 UK Biobank Participants

Open access
Gao, Min, Jebb, Susan A., Aveyard, Paul, Ambrosini, Gina L., Perez-Cornago, Aurora, Papier, Keren, Carter, Jennifer, Piernas, Carmen·2022·Diabetes Care

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify dietary patterns (DPs) characterized by a set of nutrients of concern and their association with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 120,343 participants from the U.K. Biobank study with at least two 24 h dietary assessments were studied. Reduced rank regression was used to derive DPs explaining variability in energy density, free sugars, saturated fat, and fiber intakes. We investigated prospective associations with T2D using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Over 8.4 years of follow-up from the latest dietary assessment, 2,878 participants developed T2D. Two DPs were identified that jointly explained a total of 63% variation in four nutrients. DP1 was characterized by high intakes of chocolate and confectionery, butter, low-fiber bread, and sugars and preserves, and low intakes of fruits and vegetables. DP1 was linearly associated with T2D in multivariable models without BMI adjustment (per z score, hazard ratio [HR] 1.11 [95% CI 1.08–1.14]) and after BMI adjustment (HR 1.09 [95% CI 1.06–1.12]). DP2 was characterized by high intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juice, table sugars and preserves, and low intakes of high-fat cheese and butter, but showed no clear association with T2D. There were significant interactions between both DPs and age, with increased risks among younger people in DP1 (HR 1.13 [95% CI 1.09–1.18]) and DP2 (HR 1.10 [95% CI 1.05–1.15]), as well as with DP1 and BMI, with increased risks among people with obesity (HR 1.11 [95% CI 1.07–1.16]). CONCLUSIONS: A DP characterized by high intakes of chocolate and confectionery, butter, low-fiber bread, and added sugars, and low in fresh fruits and vegetables intake is associated with a higher incidence of T2D, particularly among younger people and those with obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc21-2258

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a prospective cohort study of 120 343 UK participants followed for 8.4 years, a dietary pattern high in added sugars was associated with a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 1.09, 1.06 to 1.12) after adjustment for confounders.

    “A dietary pattern high in added sugars was associated with a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 1.09, 1.06 to 1.12) after adjustment for confounders.148”

    From Dietary sugar consumption and health: umbrella review (2023) · cites this paper as [148]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, M., Jebb, S. A., Aveyard, P., Ambrosini, G. L., Perez-Cornago, A., Papier, K., Carter, J., & Piernas, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • 4Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
Corresponding author
Piernas, Carmen
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2022-03-17
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1315-1325
ISSN
0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220855290
Cited by
46
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR203808)
  • British Heart Foundation (CH/1996001/9454)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • British Nutrition Foundation
  • Medical Research Council (CH/1996001/9454)
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
dietary habits, type 2 diabetes, new-onset diabetes, free sugars, saturated fat, dietary fiber, energy density, butter, sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juice, fruit and vegetable intake, obesity, age interaction, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Sugars, Butter, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Dietary Fiber, United Kingdom, Humans, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Biological Specimen Banks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review