Cited by 807Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022

Open access
American Diabetes Association·2022·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The need for a consensus report arises when clinicians, scientists, regulators

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc22-sint

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ADA and KDIGO each follow structured processes to assess data and develop rigorous, evidence-based guidelines for adults with diabetes and CKD.

    “The American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) each follow structured processes to assess these data and develop rigorous, evidence-based guidelines for adults with diabetes and CKD (1,2).”

    From Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2022) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Standards of Care section (p. 1) describes the ADA’s structured literature search and annual guideline updates, while Grading of Scientific Evidence (p. 2) describes its evidence-rating system. These passages support the claim about the ADA’s process, but this paper does not establish the corresponding claim about KDIGO or specifically describe guideline development for adults with both diabetes and CKD. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both the ADA and KDIGO guidelines recommend individualized and balanced diets that are high in vegetables, fruits, and whole grains but low in refined carbohydrates and sugar-sweetened beverages.

    “The ADA and KDIGO guidelines both recommend individualized and balanced diets that are high in vegetables, fruits, and whole grains but are low in refined carbohydrates and sugar-sweetened beverages (1,2).”

    From Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2022) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction (p. 1) says ADA recommendations should be adjusted for individual preferences, and Grading of Scientific Evidence (p. 2) emphasizes individual circumstances. This supports individualization of care, but this introduction does not give the claimed dietary recommendations or discuss KDIGO guidelines. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both the 2022 ADA Standards of Care and KDIGO 2022 guideline recommend comprehensive care in which pharmacotherapy that is proven to improve clinical kidney and cardiovascular outcomes is layered upon a foundation of healthy lifestyle approaches.

    “Both recommend comprehensive care in which pharmacotherapy that is proven to improve clinical kidney and cardiovascular outcomes is layered upon a foundation of healthy lifestyle approaches.”

    From Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2022) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction (p. 1) describes multifactorial risk reduction and says the ADA Standards include therapeutic actions intended to improve health outcomes. The Grading of Scientific Evidence section (p. 2) also discusses multiple risk-factor control. This copy does not specify pharmacotherapy layered on healthy lifestyle approaches or identify improved kidney and cardiovascular outcomes; it cannot establish what KDIGO recommends. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 2022 ADA Standards of Care and KDIGO 2022 guideline are aligned on issues of CKD screening and diagnosis, glycemia monitoring, lifestyle therapies, treatment goals, and pharmacologic management.

    “The 2022 ADA Standards of Care and KDIGO 2022 guideline are aligned on issues of CKD screening and diagnosis, glycemia monitoring, lifestyle therapies, treatment goals, and pharmacologic management (1,2).”

    From Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2022) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction (p. 1) identifies this work as the 2022 ADA Standards of Care and says its recommendations include screening, diagnosis, treatment, and general treatment goals. It does not discuss the KDIGO 2022 guideline or establish alignment on CKD screening and diagnosis, glycemia monitoring, lifestyle therapies, treatment goals, or pharmacologic management. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both the ADA and KDIGO emphasize the importance of comprehensive, holistic, patient-centered medical care to improve overall patient outcomes.

    “Therefore, both the ADA (1) and KDIGO (2) emphasize the importance of comprehensive, holistic, patient-centered medical care to improve overall patient outcomes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
American Diabetes Association
Corresponding author
American Diabetes Association
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2021-12-16
Volume
45
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S1-S2
ISSN
0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200310486
Cited by
807
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 200 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
97.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, health care standards, diabetes management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review