Cited by 52Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and HealthDiet and metabolism studies

Nutrition Therapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Time to Move Forward

Open access
Hernandez, Teri L., Brand-Miller, Jennie C.·2018·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Nutrition therapy remains the conventional first-line approach to treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). It will reach every woman with GDM across differing diagnostic criteria (1) and phenotypic heterogeneity (2). The goal of nutrition in pregnancy is to support maternal, placental, and fetal metabolic needs, and it may be the first introduction to a lifetime of healthy eating (3). In this way, nutrition therapy in GDM becomes an early-stage intervention in the vicious cycle of intergenerational obesity and diabetes (4). Importantly, because the prevalence of GDM has reached an alarming ≥20% of pregnancies (5), a cost-effective approach to management is urgently needed. While controlling fetal exposure to maternal hyperglycemia and overnutrition, effective nutrition can treat GDM in a way that is fiscally reasonable and culturally sensitive, ultimately reducing the need for medication and intensified health care resource use (1). The importance of nutrition therapy in GDM is a premise unlikely to be contested. Yet, the widely accepted approach rooted in carbohydrate restriction was challenged more than a decade ago based on concerns related to higher fat intake and exacerbation of maternal insulin resistance by free fatty acids (6,7). The dietary management of diabetes in pregnancy has remained in limbo ever since, with no specific guidelines for nutrition therapy in GDM, a travesty that has resulted in non–evidence-based, fragmented, and inconsistent approaches globally (8–12). Action is necessary not only because of the powerful influence of nutrition on fetal programming and development (13,14) but also because of the ability to positively impact the health of millions of mother-infant dyads. Currently, nutrition therapy appears to have become our Achilles heel, such that despite our strength, we have limped forward in generating clinical evidence to substantiate …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dci18-0014

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The challenge of MNT lies in achieving a balance between meeting the nutritional demands of pregnancy and ensuring effective blood glucose control to reduce the risk of macrosomia while simultaneously preventing starvation ketosis.

    “The challenge of MNT lies in achieving a balance between meeting the nutritional demands of pregnancy and ensuring effective blood glucose control to reduce the risk of macrosomia while simultaneously preventing starvation ketosis [14].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period [Internet], 2015 Available from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3/chapter/1-Recommendations#gestational-diabetes-2. Accessed 14 March 2018 25950069

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernandez, T. L., & Brand-Miller, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Hernandez, Teri L.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2018-06-14
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
1343-1345
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2809684920
Cited by
52
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Janssen Research & Development
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK101659)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Glycemic Index Foundation
  • Food Innovation Australia Limited
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, nutritional therapy, carbohydrate restriction, maternal hyperglycemia, fetal programming, maternal insulin resistance, free fatty acids, intergenerational obesity, cost-effective care, dietary guidelines
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Insulin, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational, Nutrition Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review