Cited by 301Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareBirth, Development, and Health

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Diet: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Examining the Impact of Modified Dietary Interventions on Maternal Glucose Control and Neonatal Birth Weight

Open access
Yamamoto, Jennifer M., Kellett, Joanne E., Balsells, Montserrat, García-Patterson, Apolonia, Hadar, Eran, Solà, Ivan, Gich, Ignasi, van der Beek, Eline M. +12 more·2018·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Medical nutrition therapy is a mainstay of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) treatment. However, data are limited regarding the optimal diet for achieving euglycemia and improved perinatal outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether modified dietary interventions are associated with improved glycemia and/or improved birth weight outcomes in women with GDM when compared with control dietary interventions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from published randomized controlled trials that reported on dietary components, maternal glycemia, and birth weight were gathered from 12 databases. Data were extracted in duplicate using prespecified forms. RESULTS: From 2,269 records screened, 18 randomized controlled trials involving 1,151 women were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that for modified dietary interventions when compared with control subjects, there was a larger decrease in fasting and postprandial glucose (−4.07 mg/dL [95% CI −7.58, −0.57]; P = 0.02 and −7.78 mg/dL [95% CI −12.27, −3.29]; P = 0.0007, respectively) and a lower need for medication treatment (relative risk 0.65 [95% CI 0.47, 0.88]; P = 0.006). For neonatal outcomes, analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials including 841 participants showed that modified dietary interventions were associated with lower infant birth weight (−170.62 g [95% CI −333.64, −7.60]; P = 0.04) and less macrosomia (relative risk 0.49 [95% CI 0.27, 0.88]; P = 0.02). The quality of evidence for these outcomes was low to very low. Baseline differences between groups in postprandial glucose may have influenced glucose-related outcomes. As well, relatively small numbers of study participants limit between-diet comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Modified dietary interventions favorably influenced outcomes related to maternal glycemia and birth weight. This indicates that there is room for improvement in usual dietary advice for women with GDM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc18-0102

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pooled meta-analyses suggest that a modified carbohydrate-restricted diet may reduce birth weight and improve maternal glycaemic control without increasing blood ketone levels.

    “However, pooled meta-analyses suggest that a modified carbohydrate-restricted diet may reduce birth weight and improve maternal glycaemic control without increasing blood ketone levels [79,80].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yamamoto, J. M., Kellett, J. E., Balsells, M., García-Patterson, A., Hadar, E., Solà, I., Gich, I., van der Beek, E. M., Castañeda-Gutiérrez, E., Heinonen, S., Hod, M., Laitinen, K., Olsen, S. F., Poston, L., Rueda, R., Rust, P., van Lieshout, L., Schelkle, B., Murphy, H. R., & Corcoy, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospital Mútua de Terrassa (ES)
  • Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Nutricia Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Statens Serum Institut (DK)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Research and Development Department, Abbott Nutrition, Granada, Spain
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • International Life Sciences Institute Europe, Brussels, Belgium
  • International Life Sciences Institute Europe (BE)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Helen R.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2018-06-14
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
1346-1361
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2800537826
Cited by
301
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0407-10452)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, dietary intervention, medical nutrition therapy, maternal glycemic control, postprandial blood glucose, fasting blood glucose, birth weight, macrosomia, perinatal outcomes, insulin requirement
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, Blood Glucose, Diet, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Diabetes, Gestational, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review