Cited by 218Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Lilly lecture 1989. Toward physiological understanding of glucose tolerance. Minimal-model approach

Bergman, R. N.·1989·Diabetes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.38.12.1512

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After three nights of slow wave sleep suppression, insulin sensitivity decreased by about 25%, reaching levels reported in older adults and populations at high risk of diabetes.

    “After three nights of SWS suppression, SI was decreased by ~25%, reaching the level reported in older adults and in populations at high risk of diabetes [6].”

    From Sleep and metabolic function (2012) · cites this paper as [6]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergman, R. N.
Corresponding author
Bergman, R. N.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1989-12-01
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
1512-1527
ISSN
0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229511887
Cited by
215
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diabetes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
glucose tolerance, minimal models, glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review