The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Timing of Changes in Interstitial and Venous Blood Glucose Measured With a Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor
Abstract
The objective of this study was to use a subcutaneous continuous glucose sensor to determine time differences in the dynamics of blood glucose and interstitial glucose. A total of 14 patients with type 1 diabetes each had two sensors (Medtronic/MiniMed CGMS) placed subcutaneously in the abdomen, acquiring data every 5 min. Blood glucose was sampled every 5 min for 8 h, and two liquid meals were given. A smoothing algorithm was applied to the blood glucose and interstitial glucose curves. The first derivatives of the glucose traces defined and quantified the timing of rises, peaks, falls, and nadirs. Altogether, 24 datasets were used for the analysis of time differences between interstitial and blood glucose and between sensors in each patient. Time differences between blood and interstitial glucose ranged from 4 to 10 min, with the interstitial glucose lagging behind blood glucose in 81% of cases (95% CIs 72.5 and 89.5%). The mean (±SD) difference between the two sensors in each patient was 6.7 ± 5.1 min, representing random variation in sensor response. In conclusion, there is a time lag of interstitial glucose behind blood glucose, regardless of whether glycemia is rising or falling, but intersensor variability is considerable in this sensor system. Comparisons of interstitial and blood glucose kinetics must take statistical account of variability between sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kashiwagi, A., Verso, M. A., Andrews, J., Vasquez, B., Reaven, G., & Foley, J. E. (1983) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci111080 · Cited by 250
Cited by
Electrochemical Glucose Sensors and Their Applications in Diabetes Management
Heller, A., & Feldman, B. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068069y · Cited by 1,707
Wearable and flexible electronics for continuous molecular monitoring
Yang, Y., & Gao, W. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00730b · Cited by 1,315
Bandodkar, A. J., Gutruf, P., Choi, J., Lee, K., Sekine, Y., Reeder, J. T., Jeang, W. J., Aranyosi, A. J., Lee, S. P., Model, J. B., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav3294 · Cited by 761
Artificial Pancreas: Past, Present, Future
Cobelli, C., Renard, E., & Kovatchev, B. (2011) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db11-0654 · Cited by 600
Glucose sensors: a review of current and emerging technology
Oliver, N. S., Toumazou, C., Cass, A. E. G., & Johnston, D. G. (2009) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02642.x · Cited by 584
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyne, M. S., Silver, D. M., Kaplan, J., & Saudek, C. D.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2790-2794
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2142534938
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing of Changes in Interstitial and Venous Blood Glucose Measured With a Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diabetes.52.11.2790
- The paper
- Boyne, M. S., Silver, D. M., Kaplan, J., & Saudek, C. D. (2003). Timing of Changes in Interstitial and Venous Blood Glucose Measured With a Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.52.11.2790
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.